US Politics Election Extra: Harris - Trump Showdown - Haitians, Immigration, Unity, & Strategies

"He is the most unethical, lax character, dishonest person I've ever done business with or worked with."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:46⏩

Jonathan MS Pearce welcomes his viewers to the video. He notes that this is a US elections update special and that there is a lot to cover. He highlights that he is recording the video earlier than anticipated because he has a lot of information to share.

Return to top⤴️

The Haitians eating pets claims

🎦 00:46-01:20⏩

Jonathan discusses the claims made by Donald Trump and J.D. Vance regarding Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. They alleged that these immigrants were illegal and that they had eaten pets, claims that have been debunked. However, both Trump and Vance are doubling down on these claims. Jonathan highlights that this is important because it demonstrates their campaigning strategies of shoring up their base and attracting undecided voters.

Return to top⤴️

Debunking the claims

🎦 01:20-04:01⏩

Jonathan presents evidence debunking the claims regarding Haitian immigrants eating pets. He points to a video of a black man walking with geese which has been misrepresented as evidence. He notes that the man actually found a roadkill goose and was not in Ohio. He also mentions a story about a woman who lost her cat and initially claimed Haitian immigrants had stolen it but later admitted that she found her cat in her basement. The Ohio Republican governor Mike DeWine has also refuted these claims and stated that Haitian immigrants in Springfield are legal and came to work.

Return to top⤴️

Tucker Carlson's commentary on the claims

🎦 04:01-08:34⏩

Jonathan shares Tucker Carlson's response to Trump's claims about Haitian immigrants eating pets. Carlson finds it humorous and thinks it will enrage the "right people" as they're getting mad about "incorrect claims" about migrant communities. He suggests that this is a deliberate attempt to demonize immigrants for political gain. Carlson also makes light of the situation, implying that Trump is trying to normalize the accusations.

Return to top⤴️

J.D. Vance's defence of his claims

🎦 08:34-11:13⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt of an interview between J.D. Vance and CNN's Dana Bash. Vance defends his claims, stating that he has heard concerns from his constituents and that some are verifiable. Bash challenges his claims and points out that the police, governor and residents have refuted his accusations. Jonathan notes that Vance is presenting unsubstantiated claims and accusing the media of making baseless claims.

Return to top⤴️

Bash's rebuttal to Vance

🎦 11:13-14:33⏩

Jonathan highlights Bash's rebuttal to Vance, where she presents evidence that refutes Vance's claims. Bash cites a review of 911 calls that only identified two instances of alleged goose-eating by Haitian immigrants. She also mentions that Vance has retweeted unsourced social media videos from another city. Bash concludes by calling out Vance for having "nothing" to support his accusations and for doubling down on them.

Return to top⤴️

Jonathan's response to Vance's interview

🎦 14:33-15:40⏩

Jonathan expresses his disappointment with Vance's response to Bash's challenge. He describes Vance as having learned "absolutely nothing" and accuses him of doubling down on lies. He encourages Vance to address the concerns of his constituents constructively and instead of spreading false claims, he should focus on providing solutions to the issues facing Springfield, Ohio.

Return to top⤴️

Vance's accusations of violence stemming from Bash's questioning

🎦 15:40-17:57⏩

Jonathan addresses Vance's response to Bash's questioning, where Vance claims that the interview led to bomb threats. He rejects this accusation, calling it "disgusting" and emphasizing that Bash's questions did not incite violence. He also points out that Vance's rhetoric is the driving force behind the fear-mongering and negative perceptions of Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio.

Return to top⤴️

Vance's response to being interrupted by Bash

🎦 17:57-19:34⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt from the Vance-Bash interview where Vance complains about being interrupted. He states that he would respond similarly to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz if they were making unsubstantiated racist claims. Bash points out that Harris and Walz were not spreading racist accusations and that she did not interrupt them. Vance replies that he would have interrupted them if they had. Jonathan highlights that Vance is justifying his behaviour by comparing it to a hypothetical scenario that never happened.

Return to top⤴️

The Proud Boys and KKK in Springfield

🎦 19:34-20:09⏩

Jonathan notes that the Proud Boys and KKK have been active in Springfield, Ohio. He raises the point that Vance is not connecting his rhetoric with these events, even though the hate groups have been exploiting the fear-mongering and negative portrayals of Haitian immigrants. He suggests that the hate groups are fueled by the rhetoric coming from Vance and Trump.

Return to top⤴️

Brian Tyler Cohen and Mark Cuban interview

🎦 20:09-21:36⏩

Jonathan introduces a long excerpt from an interview between Brian Tyler Cohen and Mark Cuban, discussing the Haitian immigrants issue. Cuban highlights that Trump's claims have resulted in real consequences for Haitian immigrants, including children staying home from school and families facing threats to their homes and property. He likens Trump's tactics to those used during the January 6th insurrection and the COVID-19 pandemic, where his rhetoric led to an increase in violence against Asians.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's response to Trump's tactics

🎦 21:36-22:56⏩

Jonathan shares Cuban's response to Trump's tactics of vilifying Haitian immigrants. Cuban describes it as a "very negative" approach that divides rather than unifies the country. He criticizes the focus on negativity and otherizing certain groups, suggesting that Trump's approach has a hard ceiling in terms of political support.

Return to top⤴️

Polls showing Trump's hard ceiling

🎦 22:56-23:37⏩

Jonathan shares poll data indicating that Trump's support is capped at around 46%. He suggests that Trump's divisive rhetoric is effective in mobilizing his base, but it is not unifying enough to reach over 50%. He criticizes Trump's refusal to shift from his divisive approach.

Return to top⤴️

Mark Cuban's comparison to Roy Cohn's management theory

🎦 23:37-24:58⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt from the Cuban-Cohen interview where Cuban compares Trump's management style to Roy Cohn's theory of "demonize and demonize". He explains that Cohn was a lawyer who used fear and division to achieve his goals but ultimately failed. Cuban suggests that Trump's tactics are similar and will only get him so far. He also criticizes Trump's lack of character and ethics, stating that he has known Trump for 25 years and considers him to be "the most unethical, lax character, dishonest person" he's ever worked with.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's reasoning for Trump's lack of character

🎦 24:58-27:32⏩

Jonathan presents Cuban's explanation for Trump's lack of character. Cuban emphasizes the importance of character, empathy, and a willingness to learn in a leader. He believes that Trump lacks these qualities and is only interested in serving himself. Cuban suggests that Trump's actions during the debate and his past presidency demonstrate his lack of character and ethics. He also expresses concern about Trump's tendency to disregard advice and only listen to himself when making decisions.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's analysis of Trump's lack of knowledge

🎦 27:32-29:58⏩

Jonathan shares Cuban's analysis of Trump's lack of knowledge. Cuban criticizes Trump's lack of effort to learn and his tendency to become "dumber" in front of everyone. He highlights Trump's aversion to reading and his reliance on others for information and ideas. Cuban compares Trump to an "empty vessel" who is simply a mouthpiece for those who are actually driving the agenda.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's comparison of Obama and Trump's knowledge

🎦 29:58-31:34⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt from the Cuban-Cohen interview where Cuban contrasts Obama's knowledge and understanding with Trump's. He praises Obama's integrity and nuance, pointing to his detailed understanding of complex issues like the Middle East. Cuban suggests that Trump lacks a similar depth of knowledge and is not a man of great wisdom.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's view of Trump's business dealings

🎦 31:34-33:41⏩

Jonathan shares Cuban's view of Trump's business dealings. Cuban criticizes Trump's claim of being a "great dealmaker" and points out his history of bankruptcies and legal issues. Cuban suggests that Trump is not particularly adept at business and that his success is often attributed to his ability to sell a vision rather than his actual skills. He compares Trump to a salesman who will say anything to make a sale.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's explanation for Trump's appeal to voters

🎦 33:41-35:34⏩

Jonathan highlights Cuban's explanation of why Trump resonates with voters. Cuban argues that Trump is a good salesperson who connects with people on a visceral level. He understands people's fears and sells them on a solution, even if it's based on lies and manipulation. Cuban suggests that Trump's willingness to exploit people's fears is a key factor in his appeal.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's comparison of Trump's and Kamala Harris's campaign strategies

🎦 35:34-36:47⏩

Jonathan shares Cuban's observation of Trump and Kamala Harris's contrasting campaign strategies. Cuban suggests that Trump is campaigning on a platform of fear and vague solutions, while Harris is focusing on unity and a more positive vision. He points out that Trump's approach relies on demonizing immigrants, while Harris is promoting a more inclusive economic vision.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's perspective on Trump's appeal to rural white voters

🎦 36:47-39:51⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt from the Cuban-Cohen interview where Cuban discusses Trump's appeal to rural white voters. Cuban believes that Trump is targeting these voters by playing on their fears of immigrants and creating a sense of class warfare. He compares this tactic to the use of boogeymen in scary movies, where fear is exploited for entertainment. Cuban argues that this approach is detrimental to the country and that it's not a zero-sum game, meaning that immigrants are not taking away from anyone's opportunities.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's meme analogy for Trump's tactics

🎦 39:51-40:28⏩

Jonathan shares a meme analogy from Cuban, comparing Trump's tactics to Rupert Murdoch's exploitation of fear during the Brexit campaign. The meme depicts Murdoch with a plate full of cookies, while a working-class white man has only one cookie. Murdoch is portrayed as scaring the man by suggesting that immigrants will take his cookie, while Murdoch himself is the one who is taking advantage of him.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's explanation for Trump's lack of accountability

🎦 40:28-43:42⏩

Jonathan continues to share Cuban's perspective on Trump's tactics. Cuban argues that Trump's appeal to voters stems from his willingness to blame others for their problems, even though he himself has never taken accountability for his actions. Cuban views Trump as a perpetual victim who is always blaming others for his failures. He also criticizes the Republican Party's embrace of this "strong man" persona and their tendency to overlook Trump's lack of character.

Return to top⤴️

Cuban's comparison of Trump's and Harris's approaches to leadership

🎦 43:42-44:53⏩

Jonathan highlights Cuban's comparison of Trump's and Kamala Harris's approaches to leadership. Cuban argues that Harris represents a more unifying and empathetic approach, while Trump embodies a divisive and self-serving ideology. He believes that Harris's values and her focus on unity will make her a more effective leader than Trump.

Return to top⤴️

The New York Post article on Haitian motorist

🎦 44:53-46:22⏩

Jonathan discusses a story published by the New York Post about a Haitian motorist who caused an accident in Springfield, Ohio. He criticizes the tabloid's exploitation of the situation to stir up animosity against Haitian immigrants, suggesting that they were driven by the rhetoric coming from Trump and Vance. He views the article as a clear example of the negative consequences of Trump's divisive rhetoric.

Return to top⤴️

J.D. Vance's admission to creating stories

🎦 46:22-47:03⏩

Jonathan mentions J.D. Vance's admission that he is willing to create stories to get the attention of the American media. Vance initially justified his actions by claiming that he was "creating news" but later clarified that he was not making things up, but rather raising a topic. Jonathan suggests that Vance is not helping himself with his lack of substantiation for his claims.

Return to top⤴️

Laura Loomer's comments about Kamala Harris

🎦 47:03-48:00⏩

Jonathan highlights comments made by Laura Loomer, a controversial figure closely associated with the MAGA movement, about Kamala Harris. Loomer has been known for making racist and offensive remarks, and in this instance, she advocated for jailing Democrats and even the death penalty for liberals. She has also made racist comments about Harris's Indian heritage, suggesting that the White House will smell of curry if she wins the election.

Return to top⤴️

Donald Trump's response to the assassination attempt

🎦 48:00-49:22⏩

Jonathan addresses Trump's response to the assassination attempt against him. Trump accused Democrats of spreading dangerous rhetoric that led to the attack. He advocated for locking up Democrats and even called for the death penalty for liberals and those who commit treason. Jonathan raises questions about the connection between Trump's rhetoric and the violence against him.

Return to top⤴️

Marjorie Taylor Greene's critique of Laura Loomer's rhetoric

🎦 49:22-50:25⏩

Jonathan shares a comment from Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican Congresswoman known for her extreme views, about Laura Loomer's racist remarks. Greene considers Loomer's rhetoric to be "really hateful" even by her own standards. Jonathan notes that this highlights the deeply racist undercurrents within certain sections of the Republican Party. He suggests that Loomer's behaviour is indicative of a larger pattern of racism and discrimination within the Trump-aligned circles.

Return to top⤴️

MSNBC contributor's commentary on Loomer's behaviour

🎦 50:25-52:57⏩

Jonathan shares an MSNBC contributor's commentary on Laura Loomer's behaviour. The contributor views Loomer's actions as the "logical end" of the Republican Party, She suggests that Loomer represents the extreme and divisive elements within the party. The contributor also highlights Trump's history of targeting minorities and using racist language, including his comments about African and Haitian countries, NFL players, and Mexican immigrants. She criticizes Trump's willingness to put people at risk with his rhetoric, leading to bomb threats at schools and community centers.

Return to top⤴️

J.D. Vance's response to Loomer's comments

🎦 52:57-54:06⏩

Jonathan shares J.D. Vance's response to Laura Loomer's comments about Kamala Harris. Vance claims he disagrees with Loomer but reiterates her message by stating that Harris's policies have led to higher prices. Jonathan criticizes Vance for essentially repeating Loomer's racist message while claiming to disagree with her.

Return to top⤴️

The importance of unity and diversity

🎦 54:06-55:46⏩

Jonathan continues to discuss the significance of unity and diversity in American society. He mentions the story of Aiden's father, who lost his son to violence and was used by Trump and his allies to push for stricter immigration policies. Aiden's father publicly rejected their use of his son's story for political gain and insisted that it was a human issue, not an immigration issue. Jonathan emphasizes the importance of respecting diversity and ensuring that immigrants are not demonized or otherized.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's GOP targeting immigrant communities

🎦 55:46-57:14⏩

Jonathan analyzes Trump's strategy of targeting immigrant communities. He suggests that Trump's GOP is attempting to expand the "immigration issue" beyond the southern border and to paint all immigrants as a threat. This strategy, he believes, could alienate migrant communities and people of color. Jonathan questions whether this approach is the best way to win the election and suggests that it has a "hard ceiling" in terms of potential support.

Return to top⤴️

Kamala Harris's bipartisan border bill

🎦 57:14-57:59⏩

Jonathan mentions Kamala Harris's support for a bipartisan border bill that was vetoed by Trump. He argues that this bill would have been the "strongest bipartisan legislation on the border ever" and that Harris's commitment to enacting it is a strong stance on immigration without alienating moderate voters.

Return to top⤴️

The consequences of Trump's rhetoric

🎦 57:59-58:22⏩

Jonathan highlights the consequences of Trump's rhetoric, emphasizing that it is harmful to everyone involved. He mentions that the mayor of Springfield, the governor of Ohio, and the city manager have all debunked the claims against Haitian immigrants. He also notes that the rhetoric is hurtful to Haitian Americans like his friend Sheila Schifflis McCormick. Jonathan criticizes Vance for perpetuating this divisive rhetoric and for serving the interests of Trump.

Return to top⤴️

The importance of unity in the business world

🎦 58:22-1:00⏩
:08
Jonathan shifts the discussion to the importance of unity in the business world. He points out that multinational corporations with diverse workforces would likely be concerned about a candidate who advocates for division and otherization. He suggests that this type of rhetoric is not conducive to a healthy and productive business environment.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's and Harris's contrasting economic policies

🎦 1:00:08-1:01⏩
:36⏩
Jonathan contrasts Trump's and Harris's economic policies. He argues that Trump's approach is focused on tax cuts for large corporations and does not offer much support for small businesses. He highlights that Harris is focused on policies that promote entrepreneurship and small business growth, such as increasing deductions for startups and providing childcare support for entrepreneurs. Jonathan suggests that Trump's economic policies are more about benefiting the wealthy, while Harris's policies are more inclusive and aimed at creating opportunities for everyone.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's lack of support from business leaders

🎦 1:01:36-1:02⏩
:08⏩
Jonathan highlights the lack of support for Trump from business leaders, including Fortune 500 CEOs. He argues that this is a significant data point, considering that the Republican Party is often portrayed as the "pro-business" party. He suggests that Trump's divisive rhetoric and lack of support for small businesses are likely factors in this lack of support from business leaders.

Return to top⤴️

The importance of unity and a big tent approach

🎦 1:02:08-1:03⏩
:46⏩
Jonathan returns to the theme of unity and a "big tent" approach, suggesting that Harris's values and her focus on unity resonate with both business leaders and the American people. He argues that her approach to economics is as inclusive as her overall vision for the country. He contrasts Harris's unifying approach with Trump's divisive rhetoric and suggests that Trump's tactics are detrimental to business success and national unity.

Return to top⤴️

The importance of a unified country for business success

🎦 1:03:46-1:04⏩
:27⏩
Jonathan emphasizes the importance of a unified country for business success. He shares a conversation where someone suggested avoiding election talk in a workplace because of the potential for division and conflict. He highlights that Harris's values and her commitment to unity are recognized by business leaders as crucial for a healthy and successful business environment.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 1:04:27-1:17⏩
:19⏩
Jonathan concludes by highlighting the contrasting visions of unity and division that are at the core of the Harris-Trump showdown. He suggests that Harris's campaign is focused on unity and a joyful future, while Trump's campaign is driven by fear and division. He believes that Harris's approach is more likely to resonate with voters and create a more positive future for the country. He criticizes Trump's reliance on tax cuts for the wealthy and his lack of focus on policies that would benefit the working class. Jonathan compares Trump's economic approach to "trickle-down economics" and criticizes its effectiveness in stimulating the economy. He argues that a "trickle-up" approach, where money is directly distributed to the working class, is a more effective way to stimulate economic growth. He concludes by emphasizing the importance of choosing a candidate who is committed to unity, empathy, and creating a better future for all Americans.

Return to top⤴️