BREAKING NEWS: Trump's VP Pick - A Nightmare for Ukraine
Table of Contents 📖
"I am actually writing an article for a possibly resurrection of my previous writing establishment. That is basically we're not going to hell in a handcart. We're going to the apocalypse and the Tesla."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:17⏩
Jonathan welcomes viewers to another ATP Geopolitics video, a Ukraine War Breaking News Update for the 15th of July 2024. He clarifies that he misspoke and said the 17th initially. He explains that the video will be another short video about Trump, but focusing on J.D. Vance.
Return to top⤴️
Trump's Choice of J.D. Vance as VP - A Strategically Poor Decision
🎦 00:17-02:29⏩
Jonathan argues that Trump's choice of J.D. Vance as his running mate is strategically unwise. He believes that in a tight election, Trump needs to broaden his appeal beyond his base, but choosing Vance, a staunch MAGA representative, limits his ability to attract swing voters. This move suggests a "Trump 2.0" approach that may alienate those who are not already aligned with Trump's ideology.
Return to top⤴️
A Comparison to the 2016 Election
🎦 02:29-03:36⏩
Jonathan contrasts Trump's current strategy with his successful 2016 campaign, where he chose Mike Pence, a conservative Christian vastly different from himself, as his running mate. This decision appealed to a broader range of voters, including evangelicals. Jonathan then points out Vance's self-description on Twitter, noting that Vance identifies as "Christian" before "husband and dad." This, Jonathan suggests, highlights how Vance prioritizes signaling his Christian identity to appeal to a specific segment of Republican voters.
Return to top⤴️
J.D. Vance's Pro-Russian Stance
🎦 03:36-06:21⏩
Jonathan shifts focus to J.D. Vance's stance on Ukraine, presenting him as "anti-Ukraine" and "pro-Russian." He cites examples from Vance's Twitter feed, including his criticism of US aid to Ukraine, his questioning of Ukraine's potential NATO membership, and his claims that the US is depleting its own resources by supporting Ukraine. Jonathan highlights Vance's article in the New York Times, "The Math on Ukraine Doesn't Add Up," which was met with criticism and rebuttals, including a comprehensive takedown by a political scientist in The Hill.
Return to top⤴️
Vance's Past Criticism of Trump and His Transformation
🎦 06:21-08:13⏩
Jonathan reveals the irony of Vance's current position by pointing out his past criticism of Trump. He references a Reuters report mentioning that Vance previously called Trump an idiot and "reprehensible," even comparing him to Hitler in private. Jonathan cites articles from The Guardian detailing Vance's shift from a "never-Trump guy" who considered him a "terrible candidate" to becoming his running mate. Jonathan concludes that Vance's transformation reflects a pattern of political opportunism, suggesting that Vance prioritizes personal gain and power over genuine beliefs.
Return to top⤴️
Implications for Ukraine and the 2024 Election
🎦 08:13-10:57⏩
Jonathan expresses concern about the implications of a potential Trump-Vance administration for Ukraine, calling Vance's nomination "bad news." While acknowledging Vance's communication skills and appeal to the MAGA base, he argues that this choice is ultimately naive and detrimental to Ukraine's interests. Jonathan emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election, describing it as one of the most significant in history and expressing deep worry about its potential outcomes for Ukraine and the world. He criticizes those who continue to believe that Trump is a good choice for Ukraine, suggesting they are either engaging in mental gymnastics or willfully ignoring the evidence.
Return to top⤴️
Addressing Criticisms About Previous Video Content
🎦 10:59-11:46⏩
Jonathan addresses criticism from a viewer who was upset about a previous video he made that was unrelated to the war in Ukraine. He defends his content, stating that it was clearly labeled and that viewers who disliked it could choose not to watch. He reiterates that the current video is about J.D. Vance and his significance to the Ukraine war.
Return to top⤴️
Reiterating Concerns and Personal Reflections
🎦 11:46-12:39⏩
Jonathan reiterates his concerns about the impact of the US election on Ukraine, emphasizing that the choice of J.D. Vance as VP is very bad news for the country. He reveals that he is so worried about the future of the world, particularly given the trajectory of US politics and its implications for Ukraine, that he is writing an article about it. He shares the possible title: "We're not going to hell in a handcart. We're going to the apocalypse in a Tesla."
Return to top⤴️
Concluding Remarks
🎦 12:39-13:01⏩
Jonathan concludes by expressing his apprehension about the upcoming election, stating his prediction that Vance would be Trump's VP pick has come true. He invites viewers to share their thoughts and opinions on the matter.
Return to top⤴️
Wrap Up
🎦 13:01-13:01⏩
Jonathan thanks his viewers and signs off.
Return to top⤴️
