Ukraine War Live Stream w/ Jonathan Fink (Silicon Curtain) & Phil Ittner (On the Edge)
Table of Contents 📖
"There are these elements within liberal democracy that only pay lip service to it... And if they ever do come to power, I would rather... move to Russia where they at least they don't pretend that have any interest in liberty. These are the options that we are being given in this conflict."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:47⏩
- Introduction by Jonathan Fink, host of the Silicon Curtain YouTube channel.
- This is one of the first live streams on the channel.
- Jonathan is joined by Jonathan MS Pearce (ATP Geopolitics) and Philip Ittner (On the Edge).
- Announcement of a fundraiser to acquire trucks for Ukraine.
- The fundraiser has reached a third of its target in a few days.
- The trucks will be serviced, armoured, painted, and customised for specific battalions on the front lines.
- Jonathan Fink mentions that Philip has electricity as indicated by the fairy lights being back on to St Olga which is his litmus test as to whether or not he has power.
Fundraising Update - ATP Geopolitics
🎦 00:48-01:03⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce provides an update on the fundraising efforts.
- ATP Geopolitics is currently in the top position among participating channels.
- The community has raised enough for one truck and is 68% of the way to funding a second.
- Total raised: 16,800 euros.
- Jonathan expresses his gratitude for the support and jokingly mentions a desire to reach 20,000 euros first.
Fundraising Update - On the Edge
🎦 01:03-01:24⏩
- Philip Ittner discusses his fundraising efforts and his weekly interview program.
- The last episode featured Anna from Kharkiv and was done as a live premiere.
- Philip plans to push the fundraiser further in the coming days.
Different Vehicles for Different Battalions
🎦 01:24-02:04⏩
- Each channel is fundraising for different units, and videos show what the different vehicles do.
- ATP Geopolitics' first vehicle is a mini-MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System), and the second is for supplies and ammunition.
Lethal vs Non-Lethal Aid
🎦 02:04-02:47⏩
- The coordinators asked Jonathan MS Pearce if his audience would prefer non-lethal or lethal aid, and he chose lethal.
- Jonathan shares his thought process, stating that while he might have chosen non-lethal at the beginning of the war, he now believes that providing weapons to Ukraine is the quickest way to a favorable end to the conflict.
Loss of Compassion for Russian Soldiers
🎦 02:47-03:32⏩
- Philip Ittner expresses a loss of compassion for Russian soldiers on Ukrainian soil due to personal experiences and witnessing the death and destruction.
- He believes that Russian soldiers have the option to drop their weapons and leave.
Charity Efforts Shift from Rebuilding to Drones
🎦 03:32-04:29⏩
- Jonathan Fink discusses various charities that initially focused on evacuating animals and rebuilding houses but have now shifted to crowdsourcing drones.
- The realization that defending the country is the number one priority has led to this shift.
Security Before Reconstruction
🎦 04:29-05:23⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce emphasizes the need to focus on Ukraine's victory before reconstruction.
- He views the conflict as a global game of risk between Ukraine and its allies versus Russia and its allies.
- He believes the US needs to decide whether to fully back Ukraine, as its own economic and hegemonic future depends on the outcome.
US Military Aid and the Potential Impact of Trump
🎦 05:23-06:50⏩
- Philip Ittner discusses the potential impact of Donald Trump on US military aid to Ukraine.
- He suggests that the Biden administration may have dragged its feet on aid due to fear of giving Trump a talking point.
- He notes that once military logistics start rolling, it's difficult to reverse.
- He expresses hope that the Biden administration can get supplies moving to make it harder for Trump to reverse course.
Dmytro Kuleba's Views on Trump and a Potential Deal
🎦 06:50-08:05⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce mentions that Dmytro Kuleba, the former foreign minister, believes it's unlikely Trump will be able to affect a deal between Ukraine and Russia.
- Jonathan expresses uncertainty about predicting Trump's actions but believes that Trump is anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia in his own head.
Potential US-Ukraine Trade Deal and Trump's Involvement
🎦 08:05-09:29⏩
- Jonathan Fink discusses the possibility of using the potential for enrichment from Ukraine's mineral reserves to influence Trump's decisions.
- Jonathan MS Pearce mentions that Ukraine has delayed a trade deal with the US so that Trump can sign it, potentially giving him a permission structure to continue aid.
- Philip Ittner suggests that even if Trump is compromised by Putin, it may be difficult for Putin to accept a ceasefire due to Russia's war economy and mobilized soldiers.
The Problem of Demobilization in Russia
🎦 09:29-10:20⏩
- Philip Ittner raises the question of what will happen to the hundreds of thousands of demobilized Russian soldiers if there is a ceasefire.
- He suggests that Putin may be caught in a catch-22, unable to extract Russia from the war economy and deal with the ramifications of demobilization.
- Jonathan Fink brings up a comment from Julian about Trump potentially pursuing a "rich seam of bronzer."
The Wagner Group and Contract Soldiers
🎦 10:20-11:39⏩
- Jonathan Fink explains that Wagner criminals are allowed back into their hometowns, but contract soldiers and mobilized individuals are not.
- He suggests that Putin fears the latter groups returning and may transfer them to the next war zone instead.
- Possible future conflict zones are mentioned, including Armenia, Azerbaijan, Central Asia, and Georgia.
The Resilience of the Russian Economy
🎦 11:39-13:15⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce discusses an interview with an economist, Connolly, who suggests that the Russian economy is more resilient than people think.
- Sanctions are hurting, but as long as oil prices remain high, Russia can manage.
- Philip Ittner adds that Russia's economy is on a war footing, and it's difficult to predict what will happen with demobilization.
Potential for a Syrian Pipeline and its Implications
🎦 13:15-14:19⏩
- Philip Ittner discusses the potential for a pipeline from Saudi Arabia through Jordan and Syria to Europe, which could reduce reliance on Russian gas.
- He notes that this is long-term thinking and may not be relevant if Trump pushes for quick negotiations.
Trump's Potential Impact on Oil Prices
🎦 14:19-16:03⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce suggests that Trump may enact policies that inadvertently harm Putin, such as forcing a drop in oil prices.
- He believes that Trump will prioritize lowering fuel prices to appeal to his base, even if it hurts Russia.
- He also mentions the potential for preemptive drops in oil prices by Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members to avoid getting on Trump's bad side.
US Oil Production and Potential Tariffs on China
🎦 16:03-17:42⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce raises concerns about Trump's "drill, baby, drill" policy, noting that the US is already producing more oil than any other country in history.
- He also discusses the potential negative consequences of Trump's proposed tariffs on China and BRICS nations, which could lead to increased inflation and a shift away from the US dollar as the dominant international currency.
Hyperinflation in Russia and its Potential Consequences
🎦 17:42-19:10⏩
- Jonathan Fink discusses the hyperinflation in Russia during the 1990s and its potential consequences.
- While it will be painful, he believes it will not result in societal collapse or political change in an authoritarian state like Russia.
- Jonathan MS Pearce adds that the Russian economy, when considered in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), is actually the fourth or fifth largest in the world.
The 1998 Russian Financial Crisis and its Impact on Yeltsin
🎦 19:10-20:07⏩
- Philip Ittner argues that the 1998 financial crisis was a contributing factor to the end of Yeltsin's rule.
- He suggests that it created a need for a new Kremlin and paved the way for Putin's rise.
Potential for Abrupt Change in Russia
🎦 20:07-21:24⏩
- Philip Ittner suggests that change in Russia often happens abruptly, reaching a breaking point before transitioning.
- He believes there's a potential for this to happen again, although he doesn't think it will be a street-level revolution.
- Jonathan MS Pearce adds that many of the people who would be primed for protest have already left Russia or are in prison.
The Economic Situation in Russia and its Impact on the War
🎦 21:24-22:50⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce discusses the economic challenges facing Russia, including the construction industry's near collapse and high interest rates.
- He expresses hope that an economic collapse will occur, as he believes it's necessary for Ukraine to prevail.
Scale of Russian Losses Compared to Afghanistan
🎦 22:50-24:06⏩
- Jonathan Fink compares the scale of Russian losses in Ukraine to those in Afghanistan, stating that Russia is losing the equivalent of its entire Afghan losses every month or month and a half.
- He raises concerns about the potential impact of wounded and disabled soldiers returning to Russia.
Ukraine as "Deviant Russians" Narrative
🎦 24:06-25:38⏩
- Philip Ittner discusses the Russian narrative that Ukrainians are "deviant Russians" who have been seduced away by the West.
- He compares this to an abusive relationship where the abuser tries to "teach" the victim to love them again.
The Victim Narrative and Grievances of Russia
🎦 25:38-27:16⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce discusses how Russia's victim narrative and grievances are fed by being made a pariah state.
- Philip Ittner addresses the issue of Russia taking Ukrainian children and subjecting them to various forms of abuse and indoctrination.
Humiliation as a Tool of Control in Russian Culture
🎦 27:16-28:42⏩
- Jonathan Fink emphasizes the role of humiliation in Russian culture and history as a means of breaking down resilience and identity.
- Philip Ittner shares an anecdote about a genie and a farmer to illustrate the Russian mindset of accepting suffering as long as someone else is suffering more.
The Need for a Clear Narrative to Justify Support for Ukraine
🎦 28:42-30:05⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce argues for the need to create a clear narrative for Western electorates about why supporting Ukraine is crucial.
- He suggests that politicians and the media should emphasize that Russia is the "bad guy" and is engaged in hybrid warfare against Western democracies.
The Failure of Western Media to Adequately Cover the War
🎦 30:05-31:53⏩
- Philip Ittner criticizes the Western media for its inadequate coverage of the war in Ukraine, attributing it to cost-cutting and a broken business model.
- He argues that this negligence has left a void filled by freelancers and vloggers.
- He emphasizes the importance of conveying to the public that this is an inflection point and that the outcome of the war will determine the future direction of the world.
The Donbas Referendum Question
🎦 31:53-33:40⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce addresses a question about a hypothetical referendum in the Donbas, stating that he wouldn't accept any survey until exiled residents are allowed to return.
- He argues that any referendum held under current conditions would be skewed due to the influx of Russians and the expulsion of pro-Ukrainians.
- Jonathan Fink adds that there was no significant secessionist movement in the Donbas before the Russian invasion.
The Crimean Problem and the Northern Ireland Analogy
🎦 33:40-35:55⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce discusses the complexities of the Crimean situation, comparing it to the issue of planted populations in Northern Ireland.
- He argues that while it may be too late to undo some historical injustices, the Crimean problem can still be addressed if the war ends soon.
- Jonathan Fink notes that the issue of Crimea should be dealt with in the context of living memory, unlike historical disputes from centuries ago.
The Indoctrination of Youth in Occupied Territories
🎦 35:55-38:08⏩
- Philip Ittner highlights the concerns of Ukrainians regarding the indoctrination of young people in occupied territories like Luhansk and Donetsk.
- He acknowledges that there are individuals under duress and those who still identify as Ukrainian, but some fear that those indoctrinated for over a decade may be "lost."
- Jonathan MS Pearce introduces the Sorites paradox to illustrate the difficulty of defining a clear demarcation line for when it becomes unfair to return Crimea to Ukraine.
The Crimean Tatar Issue
🎦 38:08-39:46⏩
- Philip Ittner acknowledges that the Crimean issue is complex, with the Tatars potentially having a claim.
- He reiterates his earlier point about not including Crimea in his analogy with Donetsk and Luhansk due to the historical complexities.
Displacement and the Challenges of Return
🎦 39:46-41:15⏩
- Philip Ittner discusses the plight of internally displaced people from Mariupol and Ukrainian refugees abroad.
- He raises the question of whether they will return if given the opportunity, as they may have started to build new lives elsewhere.
- Jonathan MS Pearce notes that this is how Russia does empire, through a slow process of assimilation and intermarriage.
Explaining Support for Israel Alongside Opposition to Russia
🎦 41:15-42:45⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce explains the support for Israel among some Americans as being driven by Judeo-Christian values and a perception of the conflict as a crusade against Islam.
- He suggests that this theological perspective allows some to justify supporting Israel while opposing aid to Ukraine.
Fundraiser Reminder and the Importance of Trucks
🎦 42:45-44:33⏩
- Jonathan Fink reminds viewers about the fundraiser for trucks, emphasizing their importance in transporting supplies and wounded soldiers.
- He notes that drone warfare is taking a toll on these vehicles, making them essential for Ukraine's war effort.
- He also mentions that China is blocking components for Ukrainian drones, further highlighting the need for these trucks.
- Jonathan MS Pearce and Philip Ittner add that there are formal agreements and obligations to support both Israel and Ukraine, citing the Budapest Memorandum as an example.
The Budapest Memorandum and the Issue of Accountability
🎦 44:33-46:18⏩
- Jonathan MS Pearce argues that the US has an obligation to Ukraine due to the Budapest Memorandum, despite claims that NATO wouldn't expand eastward.
- He questions who holds powerful nations accountable for not fulfilling their agreements.
- Philip Ittner points out that the Budapest Memorandum is not clearly defined, allowing for wiggle room.
Article 5 and the Grey Zone
🎦 46:18-47:53⏩
- Jonathan Fink mentions that Article 5 is not specific about when allies come to each other's aid, allowing Russia to escalate in the grey zone.
- He suggests that this topic could be explored further in future discussions.
Upcoming Live Streams and the Truck Convoy
🎦 47:53-49:38⏩
- Jonathan Fink announces that they will be running daily live streams at 1 PM UK time with different guests to discuss various topics and take cues from viewer comments.
- Jonathan MS Pearce commits to driving the trucks from the UK to Ukraine if they are sourced there, forming a convoy with other participants.
Promoting Their Channels
🎦 49:38-51:57⏩
- Philip Ittner promotes his show "On the Edge," which airs every Sunday at 8 PM Kyiv time.
- Jonathan MS Pearce sets an arbitrary goal of reaching 50,139 subscribers by January 2nd and encourages viewers to subscribe to his channel, ATP Geopolitics.
Wrap up
- The hosts express their gratitude and look forward to the next live stream.
- They reiterate the importance of the fundraiser and encourage viewers to contribute.
- They promise to provide updates on the journey and the people involved in renovating the trucks.
- Philip says he needs to go and plug batteries in before he loses electricity, Jonathan thanks him for being on the show.
- Jonathan thanks the other Jonathan and Phil for joining him.
🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand
🤖💭 AI Plan (pre task) - the AI's step by step thought process
- I'll divide the transcript into topics, each with a concise and specific title.
- Each topic will have a unique ID number, starting from 1.
- The first topic will always be "Hello Team" (introduction) and the last will be "Wrap up" (closing remarks).
- Topics should be granular and specific, avoiding combining unrelated subjects.
- Topic titles will be enclosed in `
` tags.
- I'll identify the start and end timestamps for each topic from the transcript.
- Timestamps will be in MM:SS or HH:MM:SS format.
- Multiple timeframes for a topic will be separated by commas.
- The timestamps will be outputted in `
` tags, with the ID matching the corresponding `topictitle`.
- I'll write a summary for each topic, including key points, context, and any opinions or insights from Jonathan.
- Sources and credits mentioned by Jonathan will be included.
- Summaries will use bullet points or numbered lists where appropriate, with minimal use of bold/italic/underline for emphasis.
- Summaries will be enclosed in `` tags, with the ID matching the corresponding `topictitle` and `topicts` tags.
- I'll select a significant, meaningful, or humorous quote from the transcript.
- The quote will be concise and understandable out of context.
- The quote will be enclosed in `
` tags.
- I'll note any parts of the transcript or tasks that I didn't understand.
- This will be used to improve future transcripts and clarify any ambiguities.
- Queries will be enclosed in `
🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand
` tags.
- The final output will be in XML format, following the specified structure.
- I'll ensure all tags are correctly opened and closed, especially `
` and ` `.