Ukraine War BREAKING NEWS: Trump to Continue Aid to Ukraine, Wants NATO Spending 5%...?
Table of Contents 📖
"You don't sound off ignorantly about a topic that you know not enough about to the American public and to the wider world and to Vladimir Putin, you don't sound off and then come in and go, oh, do you know what? I need to change my mind."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:05⏩
Jonathan introduces the video as a breaking news update about the Russia-Ukraine war.
Return to top⤴️
Financial Times report on Trump's plans for NATO and Ukraine
🎦 00:05-00:36⏩
Jonathan discusses a Financial Times report stating that Donald Trump's team has informed European officials that he will demand NATO members increase defence spending to 5% of GDP. However, the report also indicates that Trump plans to continue supplying military aid to Ukraine. Jonathan highlights that this information comes from people "in the know" and not directly from Trump, so caveats apply.
Return to top⤴️
Trump's previous statements on Ukraine and NATO
🎦 00:36-00:52⏩
Jonathan elaborates on the Financial Times report, noting Trump's earlier vows to cut off aid to Ukraine and leave NATO allies undefended if they didn't meet defence spending targets. The new report suggests a shift, with Trump now intending to maintain military supplies to Kyiv. However, it also suggests he may link this to a ceasefire agreement.
Return to top⤴️
Trump's threats regarding trade with Europe
🎦 00:53-01:00⏩,04:03-01:16⏩
Jonathan highlights Trump's threat to impose tariffs on European goods unless the EU buys more US oil and gas. He criticises this as a "bullying approach" and notes the irony that the US has become the world's top LNG exporter under the Biden administration, which was promoting the green transition.
Return to top⤴️
Discussions on NATO defence spending target
🎦 01:16-01:22⏩, 01:52-02:00⏩, 03:35-04:03⏩, 08:54-09:40⏩
NATO allies are reportedly discussing increasing the defence spending target to 3% at the June summit. Trump's reported demand for 5% is considered "insanely improbable" by Jonathan. He also discusses the complexities of comparing defence spending across countries due to differences in healthcare systems and other factors. For example, the UK's National Health Service covers healthcare for military personnel, while in the US, it's part of the defence budget.
Return to top⤴️
Impact of US budget situation on defence spending
🎦 06:00-06:15⏩, 06:40-07:21⏩, 07:32-08:54⏩, 09:40-09:55⏩
Jonathan discusses the ongoing budget resolution in the US and Elon Musk's call to "kill the bill," which Jonathan sees as irresponsible. He explains that increasing defence spending to 5% would require raising the debt ceiling or making significant cuts elsewhere, which is complicated by the political divide in Congress.
Return to top⤴️
Reactions from European leaders
🎦 07:21-07:32⏩, 02:40-02:52⏩, 03:07-03:24⏩
European NATO allies, including France, Germany, the UK, Italy, and Poland, met with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Ukrainian President Zelensky to discuss adapting defence policies in response to Trump's potential return. German Chancellor Scholz also spoke with Trump and expressed confidence in continued US and European support for Ukraine.
Return to top⤴️
Implications of Trump's reported plan to continue military aid to Ukraine
🎦 01:22-01:51⏩, 12:00-12:53⏩, 13:12-13:28⏩
Jonathan considers the implications of Trump's reported intention to continue military aid to Ukraine. He notes that if there are no strings attached, it would be a positive development for Ukraine but would contradict Trump's earlier statements. If the aid is conditional on a ceasefire, it might not be as helpful in the current context. He points out that Ukraine needs aid to improve its negotiating position against Russia, and aid after a ceasefire would be less impactful.
Return to top⤴️
Analysis of Trump's change in stance
🎦 13:28-13:46⏩, 13:53-14:29⏩, 14:43-14:52⏩, 16:07-16:39⏩, 17:13-17:26⏩, 17:41-18:29⏩, 18:43-19:03⏩, 19:50-20:06⏩, 20:38-21:06⏩, 21:20-21:46⏩
Jonathan argues that Trump's apparent change of heart on aid to Ukraine indicates he was previously "deeply ignorant" and is now being educated by his advisors. He contends that this makes Trump's earlier statements irresponsible and that those who voted for him based on his previous stance have a right to be annoyed. Jonathan emphasises that while changing one's mind can be good, in this case, it highlights Trump's prior lack of knowledge and the risks of electing someone who is uninformed about critical issues. He highlights that it is good that he's gone back on his word, but this means his word "means crap".
Return to top⤴️
Impact on Trump's supporters and opponents
🎦 14:29-14:43⏩, 18:29-18:43⏩, 19:03-19:50⏩, 20:06-20:38⏩, 21:06-21:20⏩
Jonathan discusses how Trump's reported change in position will affect both his supporters and opponents. He suggests that those who voted for Trump because of his promise to cut aid to Ukraine should be "super annoyed" as he would be going back on his word. Conversely, those who support Ukraine but were wary of Trump may see this as a positive development, albeit one that underscores his previous ignorance.
Return to top⤴️
Viktor Orban's stance on European aid to Ukraine
🎦 16:39-17:13⏩
Jonathan mentions Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's statement that Hungary would halt European aid to Ukraine, expecting Trump to do the same. If Trump does continue aid, even Orban, who has been vocal in his opposition to supporting Ukraine, might be surprised. Jonathan disagrees with Orban but notes the impact Trump's decision could have on his stance.
Return to top⤴️
Wrap up
🎦 21:46-21:56⏩
Jonathan concludes by reiterating the importance of the news and inviting viewers to share their thoughts. He emphasizes the need to see if these reports are accurate and what the actual implications will be.
Return to top⤴️
