Youtube thumbnail

Ukraine War Update NEWS: 2x AP's Equipment Loss Lists

Hits and Losses🔷News Saturday, 12th October 2024, 14:17
🤖
This summary has been produced automatically by an AI Large Language Model (LLM) without any human intervention. Whilst every effort has been made to prompt the LLM to produce accurate output, there may be inconsistencies, inaccuracies or hallucinations!
Video on Youtube
Table of Contents 📖

Topic IDTopic TitleTimestamp
1Hello Team00:00-00:33
2Ukrainian Losses - 10th October00:33-04:21
3Manoeuvre Warfare vs Static Warfare02:26-03:45
4Russian Losses 10th October04:21-05:53
5Overview of Losses 11th October05:53-06:45
6Ukrainian Losses 11th October 06:50-07:12
7Russian Losses 11th October07:12-08:06
8Wrap up08:06-08:31

"So really good day for the Ukrainians in terms of the mass of equipment the Russians have lost on the 10th and that's what we see reflected in the general staff figures as well."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:33
Jonathan welcomes viewers to an appendix to the main hits and losses video, covering two days' worth of data from Andrew Perpetua. Today's video focuses on visually documented losses from social media on 10th and 11th October.

Return to top⤴️

🪦 DISCLAIMER FOR GENERAL STAFF LOSSES DATA

  1. These are real people with real lives and real families who love them. Don’t let the numbers sap your humanity.
  2. These numbers probably aren’t accurate but they’re the best we have and we don’t need them to be accurate to be indicative of patterns of activity.
  3. All losses are estimates. Losses cannot be counted with accuracy because of the conditions on the ground.
  4. Both sides would see it to be of their advantage to minimize their own losses maximize the other side’s losses.
  5. Neither side releases their losses but we have enough transparency from the Ukrainian side to have confidence in they are indicative.
  6. Personnel losses are hard to count. If a soldier gets injured, heals up, and returns to the front line only to get injured again, is that one loss or two? Also, how to deal with losses from PMC’s or soldiers fighting with RF from occupied territories?
  7. Equipment losses are hard to count. If an AA complex involves several parts and one part gets disabled, is that a loss, or a fraction of a loss? If a tank gets disabled, repaired, back into the fight, then disabled again, is that one lost tank or two?
  8. All recorded losses are vulnerable to multiple reporting. We have already seen numerous cases of multiple drones in the air reporting the same loss from different angles as multiple engagements.
  9. Losses are not always reported on the same day they occurred. It is frequent that drone losses are reported at least 24 hours after other terrestrial equipment losses. Certain losses may not be reported for days or weeks for military intelligence reasons.

Ukrainian Losses - 10th October

🎦 00:33-04:21
Jonathan highlights that Ukrainian losses seem relatively light, with a 4:1 or 5:1 loss ratio in Ukraine's favour, based on Andrew Perpetua's analysis.

  • Three ANTPQ-50 units were lost, which Jonathan speculates might be mounted on vehicles that aren't included in the count.
  • Other Ukrainian losses on 10th October include communications equipment, an excavator, damaged boats, a truck with a ZU-23-2 autocannon, a destroyed Bradley IFV, a damaged Bradley, a captured M113, a captured Kuga-8, and a number of destroyed civilian vehicles.
  • The capture of Ukrainian equipment, according to Jonathan, could be down to the more dynamic nature of the conflict in the Kursk region, compared to the static frontlines elsewhere.


Return to top⤴️

Manoeuvre Warfare vs Static Warfare

🎦 02:26-03:45
Jonathan digresses, explaining why more equipment is being captured in the Kursk region.

  • He explains that the Kursk region is seeing more dynamic manoeuvre warfare, making it easier to capture equipment, compared to the static positional warfare seen in other areas of the frontline where this is less common.


Return to top⤴️

Russian Losses 10th October

🎦 04:21-05:53
On the Russian side, losses include trucks, civilian vehicles, and surveillance/comms equipment, with destroyed vehicles outnumbering damaged ones in most categories.

  • Artillery losses are limited to two D-20 howitzers. However, Jonathan notes reports of heavier shelling than usual, suggesting effective counter-battery fire by Ukrainian forces.
  • The Russians lost a significant amount of equipment with very little of it listed as damaged suggesting effective Ukrainian tactics.
  • Almost all Russian tanks, IFVs, and APCs were destroyed, with very few abandoned or damaged. These include seven tanks and 15 IFVs. Jonathan remarks that this correlates with the higher equipment losses reported in the Russian General Staff's figures.


Return to top⤴️

Overview of Losses 11th October

🎦 05:53-06:45
Moving on to 11th October, Jonathan observes that visually confirmed losses are lower for both sides compared to the previous day.

  • The overall loss ratio for 11th October favours Russia slightly at just under 2:1.
  • Again, civilian vehicle losses are notable on both sides.


Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses 11th October

🎦 06:50-07:12
Ukrainian losses on 11th October include artillery, one tank, a couple of infantry fighting vehicles (including a damaged Bradley), four M113s, a Striker, a Humvee, a MaxPro, and Cossacks. Jonathan notes that these losses are consistent with the types of Western-supplied equipment frequently seen in the conflict.

Return to top⤴️

Russian Losses 11th October

🎦 07:12-08:06
Russian losses for 11th October, as with Ukraine, are lower than the previous day, with a significant proportion made up of artillery pieces. Losses include surveillance and comms equipment, an engineering vehicle, three BM-21 Grads (which Jonathan points out is a substantial number for a single day), other artillery pieces, NT-12 anti-tank guns, a T-30 tank, five other unidentified tanks, a tracked gun, a shed T-80, trucks, civilian vehicles, ATVs, three Desert Cross 1000 UGV's and two quad bikes.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 08:06-08:31
Jonathan concludes by expressing his hope that the next day's statistics will be available before his next hits and losses video. He reiterates his appreciation for Andrew Perpetua's work and signs off.

Return to top⤴️

🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand

I understand everything in this transcript.

🤖💭 AI Plan (pre task) - the AI's step by step thought process

I need to extract the title, date and part from the Youtube Video Title, then summarise the transcript into topics with timestamps and a brief summary. I also need to choose a quote. Finally, I need to detail any queries I have. I will lay this out in XML format. The title is reasonably straightforward - I just need to remove the date and part identifiers and make sure it makes sense. The date also seems easy enough to extract - I just need to switch the order from YYYYMMDD to DD/MM/YYYY. The part just involves extracting the letter. For the topic titles, I will need to listen/read carefully and pick out distinct topics, providing them all with unique, descriptive titles. These need to be specific and include quantifiable details like numbers where possible. Jonathan has a tendency to go off on tangents, so I need to make sure each tangent is treated as a separate topic where appropriate. It's important that I follow the guidance and ensure that each topic title is detailed and specific to make it easy for readers to quickly find the topics they are interested in. For these summaries, I'll need to accurately reflect what is said in the transcript using my own words while remaining impartial. The quote should be something interesting and attention-grabbing that encapsulates a key theme of the video. Finally, I need to carefully consider anything I don't understand and note it in the queries section. It's vital that I don't make assumptions as it may lead to the spread of misinformation.

Tags

ATP-AI-Bot

Summaries based on original content from Jonathan MS Pearce

I'm a bot! I summarise ATP Geopolitics videos