Ukraine War BREAKING NEWS: US Lifts Long-Range Missile Restrictions...A Bit
🤖
This summary has been produced automatically by an AI Large Language Model (LLM) without any human intervention. Whilst every effort has been made to prompt the LLM to produce accurate output, there may be inconsistencies, inaccuracies or hallucinations!
Table of Contents 📖
"The reporting of ATACMS being able to be used should have come from the reporting of ATACMS being used... Wait till the missiles hit and say, oh, yeah, by the way, restrictions be lifted."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:11⏩
Jonathan welcomes viewers to an evening breaking news update on the Ukraine War.
Return to top⤴️
US Partially Lifts Restrictions on Long-Range Missiles for Ukraine
🎦 00:11-02:46⏩
- The US has partially lifted its restriction on Ukraine using long-range missiles like ATACMS to strike Russian territory.
- This decision comes after much anticipation and speculation.
- Initially, it appears Ukraine can only target the Kursk region, where Russia has amassed troops and equipment, including North Korean forces.
- Reports from NPR, with input from an anonymous US official, indicate the ATACMS have a range of 190 miles, potentially enabling Ukraine to strike Russian military assets and logistics hubs.
- This marks a significant shift in the US position, which previously resisted allowing such strikes due to fears of escalating the conflict.
- While the UK and France have previously indicated Ukraine could use their long-range missiles (Storm Shadow, SCALP) inside Russia, this was seemingly blocked by the US. This latest development suggests a shift in the US stance rather than European nations following suit.
- Jonathan emphasizes the unjustified nature of previous US restrictions on Western-provided weapons being used within Russia.
Geographic Limitations and Potential Impact of ATACMS Deployment
🎦 02:46-04:50⏩
- Jonathan highlights a report from Ukrainian source Tatarigami, which suggests geographic limitations on ATACMS use, specifically around Kursk.
- He emphasizes the need for caution, as the exact limitations remain unconfirmed, but acknowledges this information originates from French intelligence sources.
- The intelligence suggests Russia has already relocated key air assets from Kursk, leaving less valuable targets like helicopters and close support jets within range.
- While Russia maintains numerous logistical sites and ammo depots in Kursk and Belarus, their sheer number could make it difficult for Ukraine to target them effectively with a limited missile supply.
- Jonathan points out the difficulties Ukraine faces with limited salvo sizes and potential interception by Russian air defences, impacting the success rate of strikes.
- He references previous reporting on these limitations, urging viewers to temper expectations regarding ATACMS' impact.
- Different ATACMS variants have varying ranges and warhead types, further complicating their potential use.
- Doubts remain whether Ukraine will be permitted to target critical infrastructure, like oil refineries, as the US has opposed such strikes previously.
- While ATACMS will undoubtedly aid Ukraine, Jonathan warns against expecting drastic changes, suggesting the impact on Russian and North Korean forces in Kursk will be incremental rather than decisive.
- He stresses the importance of realistic expectations to avoid future disappointment regarding ATACMS' inability to drastically shift the war's tide or eliminate Russian-Korean forces in Kursk.
Unanswered Questions and Potential Issues with ATACMS Deployment
🎦 04:50-06:12⏩
- Jonathan raises key questions surrounding the ATACMS deployment:
- How many missiles has Ukraine received?
- Are other missiles, like the American JASM cruise missiles, also being provided?
- What are the specific limitations on their use (geographic restrictions, permissible military targets, inclusion or exclusion of infrastructure like oil refineries)?
- What is the likely interception rate by Russian air defences or the effectiveness of their electronic warfare capabilities against these missiles?
- - He notes that the initial effectiveness of such weapons often declines as Russia adapts its countermeasures.
- Jonathan emphasizes that while this development is positive, the limited numbers and potential issues mean their impact might be less significant than hoped. He stresses the importance of accurate expectations.
Frustrations over Delays and US Leaks to Media
🎦 06:12-07:33⏩
- Jonathan expresses frustration over potential missed opportunities, as Russia appears to have moved valuable assets from Kursk, likely in response to news leaks.
- He criticizes the US for announcing the lifted restrictions instead of waiting for the outcome of their use, arguing that the element of surprise has been lost.
- This proactive announcement, Jonathan argues, is counterproductive and only serves to alert the Russians, hindering Ukraine's tactical advantage.
Expert Opinions and Analysis of ATACMS Limitations
🎦 07:33-09:30⏩
- Jonathan cites George Barros from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), who points out the abundance of legitimate military targets within ATACMS range, even beyond Kursk.
- He shares an ISW interactive map illustrating the restricted area of ATACMS usage, further highlighting the limitations imposed on Ukraine.
- Jonathan criticizes the limited scope of the decision, emphasizing the numerous potential targets along the Ukrainian border that could be hit if full usage was permitted.
- He speculates on the US's potential strategy of incremental escalation, gradually expanding the permitted use of ATACMS to avoid provoking Russia.
- Jonathan likens this approach to the "lobster boiling in a pot" analogy, suggesting the US aims to desensitize Russia to escalating actions by introducing changes gradually.
- However, he expresses frustration with the slow pace of this approach, drawing parallels with previous instances where the US hesitated before providing military aid (F-16s, HIMARS, M777s).
US Political Reactions and Implications for Ukraine
🎦 09:30-10:04⏩
- Jonathan expresses exasperation over the US's repeated pattern of initially resisting then eventually providing military support. He questions the logic behind the delays and wasted time.
US Political Reactions and Implications for Ukraine
🎦 10:04-15:28⏩
- Jonathan highlights the alarming reactions to the ATACMS announcement from figures like Donald Trump Jr. (who blames the military industrial complex) and Elon Musk (who argues war benefits bigger government).
- He criticizes their stance, contrasting it with the Lithuanian Prime Minister's supportive reaction, emphasizing the need for strength in achieving peace.
- Jonathan expresses concern that these reactions, particularly from those within the incoming Trump administration, suggest a less supportive stance towards Ukraine.
- He urges the Biden administration to take advantage of the remaining time to provide Ukraine with as much support as possible before the potential shift in US policy under a Trump administration.
- Jonathan's analysis of the situation underscores the urgency for Ukraine to capitalize on the current political climate in the US.
Potential for Increased UK and French Military Support
🎦 15:28-17:03⏩
- Jonathan discusses a report from Le Figaro stating that France and the UK have authorized the use of SCALP and Storm Shadow missiles against targets within Russia.
- He clarifies this might be based on a misinterpretation of previous statements and that the UK and France are not changing their stance, but merely reiterating their existing position.
- Despite this, he hopes the UK and France will permit the use of these missiles at least within the Kursk region to align with the US's decision on ATACMS.
- Jonathan sees this as an opportunity to strike additional targets within Kursk, specifically mentioning the build-up of North Korean troops near the front line.
Wrap Up
🎦 17:03-17:19⏩
Jonathan concludes the update, urging viewers to take care.
Return to top⤴️
🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand
Could you please clarify what Jonathan means by "JASM" missiles? I couldn't find any information on that type of missile. Also, does "Tataragami" refer to an individual or a specific news outlet?
🤖💭 AI Plan (pre task) - the AI's step by step thought process
This video is a breaking news update, so it's important to accurately convey the key developments and Jonathan's analysis of their significance. I will ensure to:
Clearly outline the breaking news: The US lifting restrictions on long-range missile use by Ukraine.
Detail the specific limitations: Focusing on the permitted targets in the Kursk region.
Highlight Jonathan's analysis: Include his thoughts on the potential impact, the delayed decision-making, and the concerning reactions from figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump Jr.
Capture the overall tone: Jonathan is clearly frustrated with the limitations and delays, but also hopeful about the potential impact of the decision.
I will make sure the summary is concise, informative and reflects Jonathan's insights and perspectives.
