Ukraine War Update NEWS: Military Aid & Geopolitical News

"They [the US] are able to continue their policies, which obviously depends on the results of the forthcoming election. Then they will continue this approach until 2030 because they want to drive Russia down as a dominant force in the world's energy markets."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:34⏩

Jonathan begins with a warm welcome, apologising for the slight delay due to his son's rugby match, where his son won man of the match. Jonathan mentions he's a bit behind and has a rare social engagement to attend.

Return to top⤴️

France may allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with missiles

🎦 00:34-01:31⏩

France appears to be open to Ukraine using its missiles to hit targets within Russia. Jonathan quotes Tim White, who advocates for arming Ukraine to secure victory and highlights the significance of Sébastien Lecornu, the French Defence Minister, hinting that if Ukraine were to employ Scalpey-G cruise missiles for strikes within Russia due to escalation, the responsibility would lie with Russia. Jonathan views this development as "common sense". He also quotes French Aid to Ukraine who share a similar view, emphasising that Ukraine, as the victim, should not be misconstrued as the aggressor.

Return to top⤴️

Germany's stance on Taurus missile deliveries to Ukraine

🎦 01:31-03:08⏩

Oliver Carroll provides insights into Germany's stance on Taurus missile deliveries, suggesting that Defence Minister Boris Pistorius supports sending them to Ukraine but faces opposition from Chancellor Scholz. While some reports depict Scholz as the sole obstacle, Oliver Carroll speculates, based on a conversation with Zelensky, that the US might also be involved in blocking the transfer. Jonathan ponders whether Scholz might be using the US stance as leverage, implying he'd agree if the US provided weapons like Tomahawks. Jonathan concludes by acknowledging the complex dynamics surrounding these decisions.

Return to top⤴️

Ukraine and US conduct first joint inspection of US-supplied weaponry

🎦 03:08-04:13⏩

Jonathan reports that Ukraine and the US have conducted their first joint inspection of US-supplied weaponry. The inspectors focused on verifying serial numbers, technical conditions, and storage conditions. Jonathan emphasises that numerous checks and balances are in place to ensure the accountability of military aid to Ukraine. He contrasts this with what he perceives as a lack of scrutiny applied to other US involvements over the past 50 years.

Return to top⤴️

The impact of military technology on troop numbers

🎦 04:15-06:24⏩

Jonathan discusses UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps' suggestion that the military might not need as many personnel due to advancements in technology. He notes that this viewpoint could be interpreted as a justification for not increasing troop numbers despite recruitment challenges faced by most modern armed forces. Jonathan, however, believes that integrating uncrewed vehicles, as seen in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, often necessitates additional personnel for operation and maintenance, highlighting a contrasting perspective.

Return to top⤴️

Zelensky: No need for mass mobilization currently

🎦 06:24-07:39⏩

Jonathan discusses Zelensky's stance on mass mobilisation, quoting him as saying he sees no immediate need to mobilise half a million people. Jonathan analyses Zelensky's reasoning, positing that such a decision would have significant ramifications for Ukraine's fragile economy and various industries, including those directly supporting the war effort. Jonathan concludes that Zelensky is cautious about making such impactful decisions due to their potentially far-reaching consequences.

Return to top⤴️

Russia developing mine rollers for light vehicles

🎦 07:39-08:17⏩

Jonathan reports that Russia is testing mine-roller attachments for lighter military vehicles, potentially to counter the threat of mines. While acknowledging this development as a response to a need, he expresses doubts about its effectiveness, particularly against larger mines. Jonathan observes that the need for such equipment likely extends to the Ukrainian side as well.

Return to top⤴️

North Korea's military assistance to Russia

🎦 08:17-12:30⏩

Jonathan delves into the significance of North Korea's military assistance to Russia, citing reports from Pstar11 and insights from Ukrainian intelligence chief Budanov. He highlights Budanov's assertion that North Korea's help has been "critical" for Moscow, particularly in supplying artillery ammunition, which Russia is struggling to produce in sufficient quantities. Jonathan analyses the implications of these claims, noting that while the situation on the front lines appears difficult for Ukraine, it also presents challenges for Russia, which relies heavily on external support to maintain its military operations. He links this to Putin's planned official visit to North Korea, interpreting it as a sign of Russia's dependence on North Korean supplies. Jonathan concludes by emphasising that both sides are facing difficulties in sustaining their war efforts due to a lack of personnel and equipment.

Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian agricultural exports rebound to pre-war levels

🎦 12:30-13:18⏩

Jonathan reports, citing Germany's Minister of Food and Agriculture, that Ukrainian agricultural exports have rebounded to pre-war levels following the implementation of the Black Sea Grain Initiative. He highlights the significance of this achievement, not only for global food security but also for bolstering Ukraine's economy, which is crucial for sustaining its defence. Jonathan emphasises that the success of the grain initiative is paramount for Ukraine's ability to finance its war efforts.

Return to top⤴️

France: Russia bears responsibility for escalation

🎦 13:18-14:33⏩

Jonathan revisits the earlier topic of French support for Ukraine, quoting French Aid to Ukraine's statement emphasising that if there's an escalation, the blame should fall squarely on Russia. The statement stresses the importance of portraying Ukraine as the victim, not the aggressor, in this conflict, a narrative that Jonathan believes should be consistently reinforced.

Return to top⤴️

Dutch minister calls for a European Defence Ministry

🎦 14:33-15:31⏩

Jonathan discusses a proposal by Dutch minister Jetten for a European Defence Ministry and a more independent European pillar within NATO. Jetten criticises the current state of European defence, arguing that despite spending three times more than Russia, Europe is incapable of defending itself. Jonathan notes the historical resistance to a European army, particularly among Brexit supporters in the UK, but suggests that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine could serve as a compelling argument for such an entity.

Return to top⤴️

Canada reaffirms its support for Ukraine

🎦 15:31-16:06⏩

Jonathan reports on Canada's continued support for Ukraine, quoting Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland's statement that Ukraine can rely on further Canadian assistance. Freeland emphasises that the Ukrainian people are fighting not only for their freedom but also for democracy worldwide.

Return to top⤴️

Russia's economic woes and declining energy revenues

🎦 16:06-17:09⏩

Jonathan discusses the declining energy revenues impacting Russia, citing reports from RT and other sources that indicate India has reduced its purchases of Russian oil and gas, contributing to a 30% decline in Russia's energy export revenues compared to the previous year. He explains that this decline comes after a surge in demand and prices following the invasion of Ukraine, as countries scrambled to secure energy supplies. However, sanctions and a shift away from Russian hydrocarbons have since taken a toll on Russia's energy sector.

Return to top⤴️

Jonathan Leak: Putin's petrodollars dry up

🎦 17:09-29:44⏩

Jonathan plays an excerpt from the "Ukraine: The Latest" podcast, featuring Jonathan Leak, energy editor for The Telegraph. Leak analyses the state of Russia's energy sector, noting the significant decline in revenues from oil and gas exports, which previously constituted a substantial portion of the Russian federal budget. He explains how India has become a major importer of Russian oil, often refining it and then selling it to Europe at a higher price. While this benefits India economically, it also provides a lifeline to Russia's energy sector, albeit at a reduced profit margin. Leak points out that the US has also played a role in mitigating the impact of Russia's reduced energy exports to Europe by increasing its own oil production, thereby helping to stabilise global energy markets and keep prices in check. He concludes by suggesting that the decline in Russia's energy revenues poses a long-term challenge to Putin's ability to fund the war in Ukraine and maintain social stability at home. Jonathan emphasises Leak's observation about the role of US oil production in stabilising markets, countering criticisms of the Biden administration's energy policies.

Return to top⤴️

Baltic states to bolster defences on Russian and Belarusian borders

🎦 29:44-30:24⏩

Jonathan briefly reports on the Baltic states' decision to strengthen their defences along the borders with Russia and Belarus. He mentions an agreement signed by the Defence Ministers of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, which outlines plans for defensive installations aimed at deterring potential military threats.

Return to top⤴️

US political debate on Ukraine aid and border security

🎦 30:32-31:45⏩

Jonathan discusses the political debate in the US regarding aid to Ukraine and border security, expressing his disapproval of those, like Dan Crenshaw, who appear to prioritise border security over supporting Ukraine. He criticises attempts to link the two issues, arguing that it creates a false dichotomy and undermines the importance of aiding Ukraine. He's particularly critical of those who seem more concerned with domestic political points than with the broader implications of the conflict.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's promises and concerning foreign policy stance

🎦 31:45-34:54⏩

Jonathan expresses concern over Donald Trump's promise to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict before taking office if elected president. He criticises Trump's foreign policy approach, citing his track record with the Kurds and Turkey as evidence of naivety. Jonathan finds Trump's assertion of swiftly resolving the conflict unrealistic and potentially dangerous, given his history of making impulsive decisions on the world stage. Jonathan then pivots to address Trump's stance on China, particularly his suggestion that the US shouldn't necessarily defend Taiwan if attacked. He contrasts this with the views of some Trump supporters who perceive China as a significant threat. Jonathan critiques Trump's reasoning for potentially abandoning Taiwan, which appears to stem from a protectionist viewpoint rather than a genuine commitment to free-market principles. He concludes by expressing deep concern over the implications of Trump's foreign policy positions.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 34:54-35:01⏩

Jonathan thanks viewers for watching, encouraging them to like, subscribe, and share the video. He signs off, promising a frontline update later.

Return to top⤴️