Politics Breaking News: AP Censored by White House - Freedom of Speech My Arse.
Table of Contents 📖
"This is just one of these canary in a coal mine examples of this growing autocracy, this growing sense of the American political establishment becoming the hotbed for dictatorship."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:32⏩
Jonathan starts the video mentioning that he could have filmed this last night but wasn't feeling well. He wants to discuss a "massive dollop of hypocrisy and double standards." He's noticed that there are claims "the left cancels and the left is about censorship" but he believes the current political climate highlights how some administrations aren't interested in freedom of speech or the free press.
Return to top⤴️
Trump Administration Accused of Censorship
🎦 00:33-01:18⏩
Jonathan highlights how the Trump administration appears to penalize those who don't conform to their narrative. He questions the "free speech absolutism" heralded by figures like Elon Musk, especially given the administration's recent actions. He questions if the administration truly believes in freedom of speech, particularly when they try to control the narrative.
Return to top⤴️
AP Pressured to Rename Gulf of Mexico
🎦 01:19-02:21⏩
Jonathan discusses the Trump administration allegedly demanding that the Associated Press (AP) rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America or risk losing access to the Oval Office. This demand is seen as a direct attack on the freedom of the press, as it aims to control the narrative. Jonathan points out the hypocrisy, stating those usually vocal about freedom of speech are silent when it's convenient. He then references the official statement released by the AP on Tuesday from executive editor Judy Pace.
Return to top⤴️
AP Rejects Trump's Executive Order
🎦 02:22-03:07⏩
Jonathan continues his discussion of the AP's refusal to comply with Trump's executive order. He highlights that, in their view, an Executive Order can't dictate how a news organisation writes or operates. He acknowledges the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is "guff and fluff," simply an act of jingoism. However, he emphasizes the concerning aspect is the White House's attempt to enforce the order, which directly threatens the First Amendment.
Return to top⤴️
AP Barred from Oval Office
🎦 03:08-04:04⏩
Jonathan explains that the AP was barred from an event at the Oval Office after refusing to comply with the order. Jonathan emphasizes that this act sets a dangerous precedent. He argues that restricting access based on content is a clear violation of the First Amendment. Jonathan reminds viewers that the AP is an international news organization, catering to a global audience, not just America. Their refusal to rename the Gulf of Mexico is based on maintaining consistency and recognizability for their global readership.
Return to top⤴️
AP's Commitment to Accurate Reporting
🎦 04:05-04:31⏩
Jonathan discusses how the AP will continue using the globally recognized name 'Gulf of Mexico' while acknowledging Trump's preferred term. This approach ensures clarity and avoids confusion among its international audience. Jonathan finds the entire situation absurd, drawing a parallel by suggesting Trump renaming hospitals as "bjallalas" and expecting everyone to comply. He argues that using an unrecognizable term would hinder effective communication.
Return to top⤴️
White House Favouritism and Control
🎦 04:32-05:16⏩
Jonathan compares the situation to being banned from the White House for not using the made-up word "bjallalas" for hospitals. He criticizes the White House for controlling the narrative by dictating language. Jonathan points out a concerning trend where reputable news outlets like CNN and The New York Times are being barred from institutions like the Pentagon, while pro-Trump outlets like Breitbart and OANN are granted access.
Return to top⤴️
Growing Concerns of Autocracy in US
🎦 05:17-06:22⏩
Jonathan sees this as evidence of a growing autocracy within the US political system, where dissenting voices are silenced, and only those who toe the line are given a platform. He criticizes the double standards of Trump supporters, who typically criticize the left for censorship but seem to be fine with it when it comes from their side. He expresses deep concern over the future of American democracy if this trend continues. He ends by challenging his viewers to prove him wrong and provide evidence that contradicts his view of the Trump administration's actions as dictatorial.
Return to top⤴️
Wrap Up
🎦 06:23-06:29⏩
Jonathan expresses his worry about the observed trends, urging viewers to consider the implications and potential consequences. He signs off, hoping to engage in further discussion soon.
Return to top⤴️