Ukraine Conflict: Full Frontline Update
Table of Contents 📖
"The counteroffensive doesn't exist for the sake of the counteroffensive. The counteroffensive is much more important in terms of long-term, higher-level operational planning and campaign design."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-01:03⏩
Jonathan welcomes viewers to an ill-advised but necessary frontline update, explaining that he can’t go a day without providing one to avoid getting behind on the situation. He thanks JR for the map update and reminds viewers to check the key if they’re unfamiliar with it.
Return to top⤴️
📍 FRONT-LINE UPDATE -🗺️ MAP LEGEND
Northeastern axis: Ukrainian gains and analysis of the frontline
🎦 01:03-07:25⏩
Jonathan points out positive signs for Ukraine, with blue pins indicating gains near Kuzmivka. He notes the area's history of back-and-forth fighting, highlighting the strategic railway line. He acknowledges uncertainty over whether the Ukrainian presence indicates a counterattack or simply updated information, emphasizing the need for caution in interpreting map changes. Jonathan highlights the significance of Ukrainian gains near Novoselivka and the strategic importance of the railway line. He also describes the challenging terrain for Russian forces in the Bilohorivka area, noting the high ground, forest cover, and river, all favouring the Ukrainians.
Return to top⤴️
Chatoviar: Stalled Russian advance and captured soldiers
🎦 07:25-12:54⏩
Jonathan discusses the lack of progress in the strategically crucial area of Chatoviar. He shares Javier Alvarez’s report about a captured Russian soldier whose heavy equipment was requisitioned for the May 9th parade, suggesting possible equipment shortages for the Russians. Jonathan highlights a report from Javier Alvarez about seven captured Russian soldiers. Their claims of being sent to attack well-fortified positions without proper equipment raise further questions about Russian capabilities and offensive potential. He contrasts this with Ukrainian claims of a counterattack and emphasizes the significance of capturing soldiers while supposedly on the defensive. Jonathan expresses doubt about Russia's ability to sustain a large-scale offensive due to these apparent resource constraints.
Return to top⤴️
Avdiivka Salient: Russian gains and analysis
🎦 12:54-17:54⏩
Jonathan shifts focus to the Avdiivka salient, where Russians have made small gains around Ocheratyna. Despite these gains being relatively minor (500x100 meters), he acknowledges the possibility of a renewed Russian push. He cites sources like No Report and Special Grounds confirming Russian advances and Ukrainian retreats in the area, raising concerns about the long-term viability of Ukrainian defenses. Jonathan discusses Russian gains around Pervomaisky and Neta Lave, highlighting discrepancies between Surat Maps and JR's mapping, suggesting that the situation is fluid and rapidly changing.
Return to top⤴️
Krasnohorivka: Russian advances and Ukrainian resistance
🎦 17:54-21:05⏩
Jonathan examines the situation in Krasnohorivka, where Russian forces have made advances, particularly in the northern suburbs. Both Surat Maps and Deep State Maps confirm these gains. He notes conflicting reports, with Ukrainian sources claiming to have blocked the Russian advance at a local plant. Despite this, Jonathan believes Krasnohorivka will likely fall to the Russians eventually. He questions the strategic value of prolonged Ukrainian resistance in this area.
Return to top⤴️
Velyka Novosilka: Russian gains and Ukrainian pushback
🎦 21:05-23:05⏩
Moving south to Velyka Novosilka, Jonathan notes Russian territorial gains near Urazhaine, followed by Ukrainian pushback. He points out significant discrepancies between different map sources regarding the extent of Russian advances west of Staromlynsk.
Return to top⤴️
Robotyne: Uncertain control and mapping discrepancies
🎦 23:05-24:08⏩
Jonathan discusses the contested town of Robotyne, noting conflicting claims regarding its control. While some sources suggest strong Ukrainian resistance, map discrepancies highlight the uncertainty surrounding the situation.
Return to top⤴️
Unnamed Island near Kherson: Ukrainian claims and Russian attempts to retake it
🎦 24:08-25:07⏩
Jonathan discusses an unnamed island near Kherson, where the Ukrainian general staff claims to have taken control. Despite initial claims of Russian losses in attempting to retake the island, no visual confirmation is available.
Return to top⤴️
George Barros (ISW) on Times Radio: Analysis of the potential for Ukrainian counter-offensive
🎦 25:07-31:05⏩
Jonathan plays a clip from Times Radio featuring George Barros from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). Barros discusses the potential for a Ukrainian counter-offensive in 2024, highlighting two key factors: Western weapon supplies and Ukraine's ability to reconstitute its forces. Barros argues that without active operations, Ukraine risks ceding the initiative to Russia, allowing them to dictate the terms of engagement and present Ukraine with unfavorable choices. He emphasizes the importance of campaign design and the need for Ukraine to seize the initiative, even in a limited capacity, to disrupt Russian plans and create dilemmas for their forces.
Return to top⤴️
Jonathan's concluding remarks on the importance of Ukrainian initiative
🎦 31:05-31:39⏩
Jonathan agrees with Barros’s assessment, reiterating that while absorbing Russian attacks has been effective for attrition, Ukraine needs to incorporate an element of active defense to regain some initiative. He believes that proactively challenging Russian forces, even in localized positions, is crucial for shaping the conflict's trajectory.
Return to top⤴️
Wrap up
🎦 31:39-31:39⏩
Jonathan thanks viewers for watching and signs off.
Return to top⤴️
