Ukraine Conflict: Full Frontline Update

"It's horrible, people are dying. I mean, fascinating in a purely abstract kind of strategic sense where both sides are really struggling and either side maybe could crumble if one side could get like a major sort of victory but that kind of major victory is a potentially a pipe dream."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:13⏩

Jonathan welcomes viewers to another Frontline update, reminding them to check the map key for clarification if needed.

Return to top⤴️

📍 FRONT-LINE UPDATE -🗺️ MAP LEGEND

Kupyansk-Svatove-Kreminna Frontline Update

🎦 00:13-02:12⏩

• Jonathan notes no significant change on the Kupyansk-Svatove frontline.
• He highlights a small possible Russian advance west of Kreminna, near the Tursk-Terny salient, potentially towards Terny.
• This is based on Syriac Maps, but lacks supporting tweets or evidence.
• Jonathan urges caution, as similar claims by Syriac Maps in this area have proven overzealous in the past, often reflecting temporary Russian presence rather than control.
• He notes Ukrainians retaking lost ground in the wooded area south of this, potentially near Yampolivka.
• Jonathan emphasises the speculative nature of this information, urging viewers to interpret with caution.
• He concludes by highlighting two blue pins representing confirmed Ukrainian gains, a positive sign.

Return to top⤴️

Sversk Front Line Update

🎦 02:13-02:40⏩

• Jonathan observes no changes on the Sversk front, despite previous activity near Bilohorivka and between Vesele and Berestove.
• He mentions significant Russian bombing around Verkhnokamianske, resulting in the death of an elderly woman.

Return to top⤴️

Bakhmut Front Line Update

🎦 02:50-04:18⏩

• Jonathan begins by highlighting Ukrainian gains west of Bakhmut, near Chasiv Yar.
• He attributes this to corrections of previous overzealous mapping by Suriat Maps, which incorrectly depicted full Russian control of Ivaniske.
• Jonathan believes this correction is significant, aligning with his own sources suggesting ongoing fighting on Ivaniske's outskirts.
• He suspects Suriat Maps had compelling evidence to revise their map without explanation, implying its strategic sensitivity.
• Jonathan shifts focus to Chasiv Yar, specifically minor Ukrainian gains in the canal micro-district, corroborated by a tweet.

Return to top⤴️

Chasiv Yar: Strategic Importance, Terrain & Challenges

🎦 04:18-10:41⏩

• Jonathan delves into the significance of the battle for Chasiv Yar, referencing analysis by Finnish expert Emil Kastehelmi (spelling to be confirmed).
• He explains Chasiv Yar's crucial role as a buffer zone protecting key towns like Kostyantynivka, Druzhkivka, Kramatorsk, and Slovyansk.
• The Donetsk-Donbas canal is highlighted as a major obstacle for encirclement and mechanised units.
• Jonathan praises Ukrainian defensive preparations, noting layered trenches and fortifications north and south of Chasiv Yar.
• He emphasizes the challenging terrain, featuring water bodies, fields, industrial zones, and higher ground, making Russian advances difficult even if the canal is breached.
• Jonathan examines the advantages and disadvantages of the terrain, acknowledging the forest cover hinders Ukrainian drone strikes while providing some cover for defenders.
• He anticipates persistent Russian attempts to probe defences with infantry, exploiting any weaknesses and reinforcing successes.
• Jonathan discusses the challenges of holding the canal area, with the Russians potentially cutting supply routes through northern infiltration, forcing the Ukrainians to maintain reserves and fight at full strength.
• He contrasts this with Russia's greater manpower but acknowledges Ukraine's ability to wage a defensive battle despite suffering significant equipment losses in other areas like Terny, Novomykolaivka, and west of Avdiivka.
• Jonathan notes the limited evidence of similar losses in Chasiv Yar, speculating this might encourage Russia towards more infantry-focused assaults, potentially exploiting Ukrainian artillery ammunition shortages.

Return to top⤴️

Chasiv Yar: Russian and Ukrainian Units Involved

🎦 10:42-11:31⏩

• Jonathan lists potential Russian units with elements involved in Chasiv Yar, including:
  • 98th Guards Airborne (VDV)
  • 11th Guards Air Assault Brigade
  • 4th, 85th, and 200th Motorized Rifle Brigades
  • Additional regiments from other units
  • Territorial Reserve regiments
• - He also mentions the possible presence of the "Sever V" brigade and the "Terak" Cossack Brigade, emphasizing the unknown strength of these units.
  • Jonathan reminds viewers "elements" doesn't equate to full units, suggesting both sides are likely operating below strength.

Return to top⤴️

Chasiv Yar: Analysis and Potential Outcomes

🎦 11:31-16:14⏩

• Jonathan cites Emil Kastehelmi, noting many Ukrainian brigades face challenges with "disordered men", potentially explaining their current positioning on a relatively short front.
• He acknowledges no such indication exists for Russian forces to the same extent, but emphasizes Ukrainian resilience and the rarity of significant breakthroughs.
• Jonathan argues even if Russia captures Chasiv Yar, it won't guarantee a strategic victory in Donetsk.
• He highlights the slow Russian advance (5-6km in a year) from Bakhmut to Chasiv Yar's eastern outskirts, contrasting this with Ukraine's current vulnerability due to equipment shortages.
• Jonathan believes this is the optimal time for Russia to advance, given Ukraine's weakened state and anticipated Western aid yet to arrive.
• However, he observes a limited Russian offensive, primarily focused on three main areas - Chasiv Yar, Avdiivka, and Novomykolaivka - lacking the large-scale vehicle deployments seen in previous months.
• Jonathan postulates Russia's capabilities might be more constrained now, while acknowledging Ukraine's precarious position.
• He illustrates this through an analogy of attrition, depicting both sides' strength declining over time, resulting in smaller-scale yet still significant confrontations.
• Jonathan believes Chasiv Yar's fall is likely but questions the cost for Russia.
• He suggests a mass mobilization could tip the scales but acknowledges its potential negative economic and domestic political repercussions for Russia, making it an unlikely move.
• Jonathan concludes this section emphasizing the fascinating yet tragic nature of this stage in the war, with both sides vulnerable yet neither achieving a decisive victory.
• He underscores the significance of holding Chasiv Yar for Ukraine, denying Russia an easy path to other cities and forcing them to engage in more costly offensives elsewhere.
• Jonathan emphasizes the importance of strategic defence, as ceding ground simply shifts the battle to a less advantageous location.

Return to top⤴️

Avdiivka Front Line Update

🎦 16:14-19:14⏩

• Jonathan observes a similar dynamic in Avdiivka, with a depleted Ukrainian defence facing a costly Russian advance.
• He notes significant Russian equipment losses, particularly around Tonenka.
• Jonathan expresses concern over Russian progress north of Avdiivka, pushing towards Novobakhmutivka along the railway between Novokalynove and Berdychi.
• He views this northern advance as the most worrying aspect, as it bypasses the need to cross the Derna River and provides access to higher ground.
• Jonathan notes a consistent advance between Vodyane and Semenivka, pushing Ukrainians back across the river, as predicted.
• However, he highlights contradictory mapping regarding Semenivka, with Deep State Maps suggesting a Ukrainian pushback, potentially invalidating Suriat Maps' depiction of Russian control.
• Jonathan expresses uncertainty but acknowledges the potential significance if Deep State Maps is accurate, citing the lack of corroboration from other sources.
• He criticizes Suriat Maps' tendency to equate temporary presence with control and emphasizes the need for cautious interpretation.
• Jonathan cites Andrew Perpetua's analysis from Geek Talk, which questions Russian presence in Semenivka due to a lack of recent evidence, suggesting a potential intelligence gap or Ukrainian success in repelling them.
• Jonathan concludes by acknowledging the unknowns in this area, stressing the need for further confirmation but remaining optimistic about the possibility of overstated Russian gains.

Return to top⤴️

Avdiivka Frontline - Suriat Maps Analysis

🎦 19:14-20:24⏩

• Jonathan examines Suriat Maps' tweets for clarification on Avdiivka, noting claims of Russian control over the eastern bank of the Donets River near Semenivka and a failed Ukrainian defence of the central line.
• He expresses confusion over the latter claim, given previous depictions of Russian control and the lack of clarity on Ukrainian counterattacks.
• Jonathan criticizes Suriat Maps' ambiguous language, contrasting it with Andrew Perpetua's more cautious and often accurate approach, highlighting the frequent disagreements between these sources.

Return to top⤴️

Donetsk City Front Line Update

🎦 20:24-21:34⏩

• Jonathan shifts focus south to the Donetsk City frontline, reporting substantial gains for Russia near Krasnohorivka according to Suriat Maps, with more conservative assessments from Deep State Maps.
• He notes Andrew Perpetua is yet to confirm these developments and anticipates further updates.
• Jonathan details Suriat Maps' claims, describing significant Russian advances inside Krasnohorivka, capturing areas at the southeastern outskirts, including the train station and streets like Zaliznychnyi, Lermontov, and Vozmozhna.
• He remains cautious, emphasizing the potential for successful Ukrainian counterattacks despite the reported gains.

Return to top⤴️

Novomaiors’ke Front Line Update

🎦 21:34-24:06⏩

• Moving on to Novomaiors’ke, Jonathan highlights potential Russian gains, expressing concern given their momentum in Krasnohorivka.
• He acknowledges Andrew Perpetua's assessment of a failed Russian attack in this area despite territorial gains, attributing it to heavy equipment losses.
• Jonathan concurs with the assessment, emphasizing the significant Russian losses in both equipment and personnel.
• He transitions to Institute for the Study of War (ISW) reports indicating Ukrainian counterattacks and territorial gains near Novomaiors’ke.
• Jonathan presents evidence from "Shadow" (a Twitter user) of a destroyed Russian assault squad in the area, corroborated by "Geek" from Andrew Perpetua's team confirming Ukrainian presence in trenches at that location.
• He concludes this information discredits Suriat Maps' claims of Russian control west of Novomaiors’ke, suggesting it is likely a contested grey zone.
• Jonathan reinforces the importance of cautious map interpretation, highlighting frequent discrepancies between Suriat Maps and sources like Andrew Perpetua, leading to public disagreements.
• He expresses a preference for Perpetua's conservative approach while acknowledging the eventual confirmation of some Suriat Maps' claims.

Return to top⤴️

Donetsk Southern Front Line Update

🎦 24:06-26:31⏩

• Jonathan shifts to the southern Donetsk front, noting Russian advances west of Solodke, between Novomykhailivka and Volodymyrivka.
• He provides limited details, simply acknowledging the change in control.
• Moving further south, Jonathan observes minor discrepancies between Deep State Maps and Suriat Maps near Staromlynivka, primarily involving tree lines.
• He reiterates Andrew Perpetua's more conservative assessment in this area, compared to Suriat Maps.
• Jonathan addresses a mistaken reference to Robotyne, clarifying he's discussing an area near Velyka Novosilka.
• He confirms Suriat Maps' reporting of Russian advances southwest of Staromlynivka while highlighting successful Ukrainian defence of Irynivka despite multiple Russian attempts to capture the town.
• Jonathan concludes by stating there are no changes in Robotyne or the Dnipro River delta.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 26:31-27:51⏩

• Jonathan thanks viewers for watching and encourages them to like, subscribe, and share the video.
• He reminds viewers of his recent interview with Sean Pinner, a British national captured and tortured in Mariupol.
• Jonathan expresses admiration for Pinner's resilience and the fascinating insights shared during the interview.
• He reveals receiving positive feedback from interviewees, including Ada Wordsworth, who appreciated his unique and thought-provoking questions.
• Jonathan admits to missing two "dark" questions he intended to ask Pinner, expressing regret but encouraging viewers to watch the interview and form their own opinions.
• He concludes with a farewell and a reminder to take care.

Return to top⤴️