Trump-Musk Divorce: What's Happened, Where's It Going, & New X Algorithm?! US Politics Extra

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:29⏩
Jonathan welcomes viewers to another ATP Geopolitics video, introducing it as a US politics news extra focusing on disinformation, social media, and the relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump.

Return to top⤴️

Analyst Predictions of Trump-Musk Breakup

🎦 00:29-01:04⏩
Jonathan notes that many analysts, such as Anti-Skamruchi, have long predicted a rupture between Trump and Musk, arguing that their narcissistic personalities and lust for power make coexisting and working jointly towards goals impossible.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Departure from White House Role

🎦 01:05-01:35⏩
Musk's 130-day (technically 138-day) stint as an unofficial, unpaid envoy concluded, with the White House effectively telling him "see you later, mate" and suggesting he spend time with Tesla.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Farewell Gift and Musk's Declining Public Image

🎦 01:36-03:26⏩
Trump gave Musk a "gaudy" gold "key to the White House" in an "odd" Oval Office presser. Jonathan observed Musk appearing "on the drugs that he's claimed to be on." Musk's public image had been "disastrous," with associations to "fascist salutes," plummeting PR, and even Tesla vehicles being vandalised. Trump's team ultimately decided Musk was "politically poisonous" and "dragging you down" in terms of PR and polling.

Return to top⤴️

Tesla Board Pressures and Financial Impact of Musk's Political Statements

🎦 03:26-04:29⏩
The CEOs of Tesla reportedly urged Musk to stop his political commentary on Twitter (now X), as it was harming the Tesla brand. As Tesla's primary consumers are typically more liberal, they reacted negatively to Musk's political alignment, leading to "massive drops in Tesla sales." The board advised him to cease political involvement and focus on his companies.

Return to top⤴️

Emerging Public Disagreements and Potential for Future Conflict

🎦 04:29-06:15⏩
A Wall Street Journal article and a "cringeworthy" CBS interview have brought the disagreements between Trump and Musk into the public eye. Jonathan believes a full public spat is unlikely due to the risk of Musk using his platform to "completely damage Trump." However, a "divorce" could provide an "excuse to reject Trump" for some Musk supporters who might otherwise support Trump despite concerns over policies that favour the wealthy over the working class.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Strategic Interest in Maintaining Civility for Business Contracts

🎦 06:15-07:25⏩
Jonathan explains that it is in Musk's best interest to maintain a civil relationship with Trump, as SpaceX is vying for contracts from the Trump administration. Furthermore, a public spat could lead Trump to reinstate previously halted investigations by the FAA, SEC, and FCC into Musk and his companies.

Return to top⤴️

Wall Street Journal Article: Trump's Scepticism Over Musk's Spending Cut Promises

🎦 07:25-09:05⏩
Jonathan reads from a Wall Street Journal article detailing Trump's scepticism over Musk's unfulfilled promises of government spending cuts, which had initially been touted as $2 trillion but progressively shrank. Trump reportedly questioned if it was "all bullshit," reflecting frustration within the administration over the impracticality of Musk's proposals. Despite these tensions, Trump and Musk recently had a friendly farewell dinner.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's View of Musk: "50 Percent Genius, 50 Percent Boy"

🎦 09:05-10:33⏩
Trump described Musk as "50 percent genius, 50 percent boy," a characterisation Jonathan largely agrees with. He acknowledges Musk's visionary qualities and ability to amplify projects to a global stage, despite criticism that he doesn't always invent from scratch. However, Jonathan also highlights Musk's "50 percent boy" side, characterised by his desire for attention and tendency to have "public tantrums." White House aides also reported Trump using a "90 percent genius, 10 percent boy" description for Musk.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Interference in OpenAI Deal and Trump's Appeasement

🎦 10:33-11:18⏩
Jonathan recounts a conflict where Musk became "incensed" by an OpenAI deal led by his rival, Sam Altman, which was set to be announced during a presidential trip. Musk complained to White House officials, leading Trump to rearrange his schedule, delay the announcement, and ensure Altman did not appear publicly with him, all to appease Musk.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Reasons for Leaving Government and Business Challenges

🎦 11:18-12:15⏩
Musk privately expressed his rationale for leaving government service was "to get some heat off me and my companies." Tesla had seen a significant 71% slide in net income in the first quarter, and SpaceX faced setbacks, including a rocket explosion. During a cabinet meeting, Musk reportedly complained about the damage to his cars and the difficulty of his business situation, surprising officials. Attorney General Pan Bondi promised to prosecute individuals damaging Tesla vehicles. Jonathan also notes that a pledged $100 million donation from Musk to Trump's political action committee has not yet materialised.

Return to top⤴️

Internal White House Conflicts with Musk's Department of Government Efficiency

🎦 12:16-13:36⏩
Musk reportedly accused the White House of lacking commitment to reform. Trump's advisors described Musk's tenure as "a whirlwind ride," marked by late-night messages, overnight stays at the White House, and surprising decisions. Musk clashed with Chief of Staff Suzy Wiles and communications officials, making "dramatic government cuts without consulting others." Aides often learned about his actions from news reports, making it difficult to coordinate messaging. Jonathan believes Suzy Wiles was key in pushing Musk out. Musk also felt the White House shouldn't control his staff within the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge).

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Public Attacks on Republicans and Political Interference

🎦 13:37-16:09⏩
Trump and his advisors were frustrated by Musk's public attacks, such as calling Senator Todd Young a "deep state puppet" (a post Musk later removed after Vice President J.D. Vance intervened). They were also concerned by Musk's involvement in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race, where his backed candidate, Brad Schimel, lost, making the election a referendum on Musk and Trump. Trump was annoyed by Schimel's inability to answer questions about abortion. Musk also publicly criticised cabinet secretaries and trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him "a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks," which surprised Trump in cabinet meetings.

Return to top⤴️

Personal and Professional Tensions within the White House

🎦 16:09-17:40⏩
Jonathan adds further details on internal White House tensions, including claims of a physical altercation between Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Pesent, and known disagreements with Transportation Secretary Scott Duffy. He also mentions rumours regarding Katie Miller, Stephen Miller's wife, now being closely involved with Musk, possibly contributing to Stephen Miller's perceived anger. White House aides reportedly resented Katie Miller claiming to speak for Musk. Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought control of his agency after Musk made drastic, unilateral cuts to USAID funding.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Opposition to Trump's Tariffs and Pentagon Briefing Conflict

🎦 17:40-19:14⏩
Behind the scenes, Musk strongly opposed Trump's "Liberation Day tariffs," arguing they would be "terrible for the global economy" (a point Jonathan agrees with). He lobbied business executives and Trump's advisors against them, complaining Trump received "bad advice." However, Trump remained committed to the tariffs. Trump became "irritated" when he learned Musk received a top-secret Pentagon briefing on China, viewing it as a conflict of interest due to Musk's existing space contracts.

Return to top⤴️

Disagreements Over the "Big, Beautiful Bill" and AI Regulation

🎦 19:14-20:42⏩
Musk continued to frustrate White House officials with cuts to the Health and Human Services Department and public attacks on the congressional tax bill. Jonathan notes that Trump seemed less angry about Musk's criticism of the tax bill, suggesting Trump himself might have reservations about the "massive" and "incredibly controversial" legislation, which was pushed by groups like the Heritage Foundation. Jonathan highlights a hidden clause within the bill, potentially inserted by Musk's influence, that would prevent AI regulation for 10 years. Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly stated she would not have voted for the bill if she had known about this clause, given its 1,000-page length.

Return to top⤴️

Cringeworthy CBS Interview with Elon Musk

🎦 20:43-22:26⏩
Jonathan describes a "deeply, deeply uncomfortable" CBS interview where Musk awkwardly deflected questions about tariffs and a proposed ban on foreign students (which benefited him), insisting on discussing "spaceships" over "presidential policy." Jonathan found the interviewer's subsequent remark, "I thought we were supposed to talk about that," particularly telling of the awkwardness, appreciating the interaction between "two introverted people."

Return to top⤴️

Musk's "Bind" Regarding Public Disagreement with Trump Administration

🎦 22:26-26:01⏩
Musk admitted he doesn't "agree with everything the administration does" but finds it difficult to speak up publicly to avoid "a bone of contention." He feels "stuck in a bind," not wanting to oppose the administration but also not wanting to take responsibility for all its actions. Jonathan finds this a "fine position," understanding Musk's predicament, especially regarding tariffs that would be "ruinous" to his global businesses and supply chains, unlike a minor policy disagreement.

Return to top⤴️

Musk's Public Denunciation of the Congressional Spending Bill

🎦 26:01-28:08⏩
Musk has recently been "very vocal" in his opposition to the "massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill," calling it a "disgusting abomination" and urging "shame on those who voted for it." He even called for "all politicians who betrayed the American people" to be "fired" in the next election, seemingly targeting Republicans who supported Trump's "big, beautiful bill." Musk claimed the bill would increase the budget deficit by $2.5 trillion (Jonathan suggests it could be higher, potentially $4 trillion). Jonathan notes Musk's anger is "justifiable," given his previous efforts to cut government spending (ranging from $30 billion to $150 billion in savings) are dwarfed by this proposed deficit increase.

Return to top⤴️

Continued Debate on Trump-Musk "Divorce" and Financial Implications

🎦 28:08-31:06⏩
A panel from "The Bulwark" debated whether the Trump-Musk relationship would culminate in a "full-on public divorce." They highlighted that the bill removes tax credits for electric vehicles and home solar energy, which is a "direct hit to Elon's wallet." Despite Musk's strong public condemnation, some still doubt a complete breakup, especially as Musk was observed retweeting Mike Lee shortly after his "shame" post. However, Jonathan speculates Musk's impulsive tweeting could lead to a sudden, explosive break if he were to create a "Peter Retardo" style insult for Trump. The panel suggested a true breakup would be signalled by Trump claiming to have "never met the guy." Jonathan concludes that too much is at stake for either figure to truly jettison the other, citing Trump's need for Musk's influence and Musk's need for government contracts for his businesses.

Return to top⤴️

Alleged Shift in X (Twitter) Algorithm Towards Anti-Republican and Pro-Ukraine Content

🎦 31:06-33:25⏩
Jonathan shares a "fascinating" observation from Spencer Hakimian, who uses an anonymous Twitter (X) account to monitor its algorithm. Hakimian noticed a "clear shift" where his feed, usually filled with pro-Trump AI content and scams, was suddenly dominated by posts "trashing Republicans for the big, beautiful bill" and "praising Ukraine's military efforts." This suggests Elon Musk has "definitely put his hand on the scale" to promote an anti-Republican/anti-spending bill and pro-Ukraine slant. Jonathan notes that X's algorithm was previously known to amplify Republican voices pre-election, making this new alleged adjustment "pretty underhand tactics" from someone who was instrumental in Trump's initial rise to power.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 33:25-33:33⏩
Jonathan concludes the video by inviting viewers to share their thoughts on the evolving Trump-Musk relationship and the alleged changes to the X algorithm. He signs off, wishing them well.

Return to top⤴️

0123456789