Youtube thumbnail

Ukraine War Upd. EXTRA: Andrew Perpetua's Weekend Loss Lists

Hits and Losses🔷Extra Monday, 26th August 2024, 11:48
🤖
This summary has been produced automatically by an AI Large Language Model (LLM) without any human intervention. Whilst every effort has been made to prompt the LLM to produce accurate output, there may be inconsistencies, inaccuracies or hallucinations!
Video on Youtube
Table of Contents 📖

Topic IDTopic TitleTimestamp
1Hello Team00:00-00:26
2Explanation for Separate Video on Andrew Perpetua's Data00:26-01:36
3Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Initial Observations and Caveats01:36-03:20
4Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Detailed Analysis03:20-05:14
5Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Trucks, Civilian Vehicles, and Deliberate Targeting05:14-08:14
6Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Summary and Russian Civilian Vehicle Targeting08:14-09:03
7Russian Losses - Three Days Ago - Initial Observations and Specific Losses09:03-10:30
8Russian and Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Summary10:30-11:00
9Russian and Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - Initial Observations11:00-11:46
10Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - Detailed Analysis and Concerns11:46-13:27
11Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - American Equipment and Civilian Losses13:27-14:14
12Russian Losses - Two Days Ago - High-Value Losses and Artillery Degradation14:14-16:09
13Russian Losses - Two Days Ago - Destroyed vs. Damaged Ratio and Civilian Losses16:09-16:47
14Summary of Losses - Two Days Ago - Concerns for Ukraine16:47-17:53
15Wrap up17:53-18:01

"These are undoubtedly just outright war crimes here each one of those will be a war crime where the russians are purposefully targeting civilians and one theory is in herson direction they are using um the that area as a proving ground, as a training ground for their drone pilots where they go. And unfortunately, they train an awful lot of civilians..."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-00:26

Jonathan welcomes viewers back to the channel and explains that he is using his headset for this video due to feedback about audio quality. He expresses his slight disappointment as he prefers using his boom mic.

Return to top⤴️

🪦 DISCLAIMER FOR GENERAL STAFF LOSSES DATA

  1. These are real people with real lives and real families who love them. Don’t let the numbers sap your humanity.
  2. These numbers probably aren’t accurate but they’re the best we have and we don’t need them to be accurate to be indicative of patterns of activity.
  3. All losses are estimates. Losses cannot be counted with accuracy because of the conditions on the ground.
  4. Both sides would see it to be of their advantage to minimize their own losses maximize the other side’s losses.
  5. Neither side releases their losses but we have enough transparency from the Ukrainian side to have confidence in they are indicative.
  6. Personnel losses are hard to count. If a soldier gets injured, heals up, and returns to the front line only to get injured again, is that one loss or two? Also, how to deal with losses from PMC’s or soldiers fighting with RF from occupied territories?
  7. Equipment losses are hard to count. If an AA complex involves several parts and one part gets disabled, is that a loss, or a fraction of a loss? If a tank gets disabled, repaired, back into the fight, then disabled again, is that one lost tank or two?
  8. All recorded losses are vulnerable to multiple reporting. We have already seen numerous cases of multiple drones in the air reporting the same loss from different angles as multiple engagements.
  9. Losses are not always reported on the same day they occurred. It is frequent that drone losses are reported at least 24 hours after other terrestrial equipment losses. Certain losses may not be reported for days or weeks for military intelligence reasons.

Explanation for Separate Video on Andrew Perpetua's Data

🎦 00:26-01:36

Jonathan explains that he is releasing a separate video focusing on Andrew Perpetua's visually confirmed loss data, as a backlog resulted in three days' worth of data, which would be too extensive to include in his regular hits and losses update. He highlights the significance of these figures, particularly as they indicate unusually heavy Ukrainian losses two days prior.

Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Initial Observations and Caveats

🎦 01:36-03:20

Jonathan begins analysing the Ukrainian losses from three days ago, noting the substantial number of losses compared to usual figures. He emphasises:

  • Surveillance and Comms Losses: While significant in number, these losses are less critical as they are relatively easily replaced compared to heavy equipment.
  • Civilian Vehicle Losses: The high number of Ukrainian civilian vehicle losses likely inflates the overall figures and warrants further examination.
  • Unknown Losses: Some losses remain unattributed, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.


Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Detailed Analysis

🎦 03:20-05:14

Jonathan delves into the specifics of Ukrainian equipment losses, noting:

  • Plastin RP 3000: He expresses the need to research this system further and encourages viewers to share any insights. (Jonathan thanks a viewer, Ivan, for a cup of tea).
  • Destroyed, Abandoned, and Captured Equipment: A large proportion of Ukrainian losses, particularly infantry fighting vehicles, fall into these categories, which is concerning.
  • Specific Losses: He lists significant losses, including a BM-21 multiple launch rocket system, tanks, a Dutch YPR 765, BMPs, Humvees, BTRs, MaxPros, Cougars, and Kozak MRAPs.
  • Kozak MRAPs: While the loss of these indigenously made vehicles is not ideal, it highlights Ukraine's domestic manufacturing capabilities.


Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Trucks, Civilian Vehicles, and Deliberate Targeting

🎦 05:14-08:14

Continuing his analysis, Jonathan highlights:

  • Truck and Civilian Vehicle Losses: Numerous trucks and civilian vehicles equipped with night vision were destroyed, likely indicating a Russian Iskander strike on a logistics base.
  • Deliberate Targeting of Civilian Vehicles: Jonathan condemns the destruction of civilian vehicles in the Kherson region, deeming it a war crime and potential terrorism. He theorizes that Russians might be using the area as a training ground for drone pilots, with civilians becoming unfortunate targets.


Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Summary and Russian Civilian Vehicle Targeting

🎦 08:14-09:03

Jonathan summarises the Ukrainian losses, emphasizing that while significant, they are less alarming when considering the caveats he previously mentioned. He reiterates his condemnation of Russian attacks on civilian vehicles and the deliberate targeting of civilians in Kherson.

Return to top⤴️

Russian Losses - Three Days Ago - Initial Observations and Specific Losses

🎦 09:03-10:30

Shifting to Russian losses from three days ago, Jonathan observes:

  • Surveillance and Comms Losses: Similar to Ukrainian losses, the Russians also experienced losses in this category.
  • High Proportion of Destroyed Equipment: Most Russian combat asset losses are destroyed rather than damaged or abandoned, indicating effective Ukrainian engagement.
  • Specific Losses: Significant losses include a BM-27 Uragan multiple launch rocket system, a T-90M tank (highlighted as a major loss), a T-64BV, BMP-2s, APCs, and civilian vehicles.


Return to top⤴️

Russian and Ukrainian Losses - Three Days Ago - Summary

🎦 10:30-11:00

Jonathan summarises that the losses incurred by both sides three days ago were not overly substantial, with the exception of the Russian T-90M tank. He highlights the concerning trend of Russians targeting a high number of civilian vehicles.

Return to top⤴️

Russian and Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - Initial Observations

🎦 11:00-11:46

Moving to the losses from two days ago, Jonathan notes that the Russians suffered heavier losses compared to the Ukrainians, primarily due to significant artillery losses showcased in Ukrainian footage. He questions whether the consistent Ukrainian targeting of Russian surveillance and comms equipment is systematic or simply opportunistic.

Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - Detailed Analysis and Concerns

🎦 11:46-13:27

Examining the Ukrainian losses in detail, Jonathan points out:

  • Improved Damaged vs. Destroyed Ratio: This ratio is slightly better compared to three days prior, except for infantry fighting vehicles.
  • Bradley Losses: The loss of three Bradleys raises concerns, particularly as he has not yet observed any recent shipments of these valuable vehicles to Ukraine.
  • Other Losses: Other losses include a BTR-4, BMP-1s and 2s, and a Kozak-7.


Return to top⤴️

Ukrainian Losses - Two Days Ago - American Equipment and Civilian Losses

🎦 13:27-14:14

Jonathan emphasizes:

  • American Equipment Losses: All damaged or destroyed APCs listed, including Humvees, an M113, and Strikers, were provided by the US. He is relieved that most were damaged rather than destroyed.
  • Civilian Vehicle and Boat Losses: The destruction of both a military and a civilian boat by Russian forces is highlighted, further emphasizing the deliberate targeting of civilians and the war crimes being committed.


Return to top⤴️

Russian Losses - Two Days Ago - High-Value Losses and Artillery Degradation

🎦 14:14-16:09

Turning to Russian losses, Jonathan notes:

  • High-Value Losses: Significant losses include a Buk air defence system, electronic warfare and surveillance equipment, and a Zoopark radar system, which represents a financially and strategically significant blow to the Russians.
  • Artillery Degradation: The destruction of multiple D-30 howitzers by Ukrainian Kazan and FPV drones contributes to the high number of artillery losses reported by the Ukrainian General Staff.


Return to top⤴️

Russian Losses - Two Days Ago - Destroyed vs. Damaged Ratio and Civilian Losses

🎦 16:09-16:47

Jonathan further analyses the Russian losses, stating:

  • Destroyed vs. Damaged Ratio: The ratio remains heavily skewed towards destroyed equipment, indicating successful Ukrainian engagements.
  • Civilian Losses: A substantial number of civilian vehicles were destroyed, reinforcing the earlier point about the targeting of civilians.


Return to top⤴️

Summary of Losses - Two Days Ago - Concerns for Ukraine

🎦 16:47-17:53

Summarising the losses from two days ago, Jonathan reiterates that the Russians suffered heavier losses overall. However, he expresses concerns about the number of Bradleys and other infantry fighting vehicles being lost by the Ukrainians and questions their replaceability. He advocates for the US to potentially prioritize supplying more Bradleys, given their versatility and effectiveness in the current conflict.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap up

🎦 17:53-18:01

Jonathan concludes the video by stating his intention to return to his regular hits and losses updates and bids his viewers farewell.

Return to top⤴️

🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand

I am unsure what "Plastin RP 3000" refers to. Is this a type of military equipment or system? Could you please clarify?

🤖💭 AI Plan (pre task) - the AI's step by step thought process

This is my process: Understand the context: I'll start by thoroughly understanding the context surrounding ATP Geopolitics, Jonathan's work, and the purpose of "ATP Distilled." Analyse the task requirements: I'll carefully analyse the steps involved in summarising each video transcript, paying close attention to the rules and guidance provided for each task. Develop a systematic approach: I'll devise a systematic approach to efficiently extract the required information from the transcript, ensuring accuracy and adherence to the specified format. Prioritise clarity and conciseness: In my summaries, I'll prioritise clarity and conciseness, using bullet points, bolding, and italics sparingly for emphasis. Maintain Jonathan's voice: I'll strive to maintain Jonathan's insightful and engaging style in my summaries, conveying his opinions, analysis, and even his humour. Seek clarification when needed: I won't hesitate to use the 🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand tag to highlight any uncertainties or ambiguities in the transcript. Proofread and review: Before finalising the summary, I'll thoroughly proofread and review it to ensure accuracy, clarity, and adherence to all guidelines.

Tags

ATP-AI-Bot

Summaries based on original content from Jonathan MS Pearce

I'm a bot! I summarise ATP Geopolitics videos