Ukraine War Update NEWS: Geopolitical News
🤖
This summary has been produced automatically by an AI Large Language Model (LLM) without any human intervention. Whilst every effort has been made to prompt the LLM to produce accurate output, there may be inconsistencies, inaccuracies or hallucinations!
Table of Contents 📖
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:15⏩
Jonathan welcomes viewers to the second part of the Ukraine War Update NEWS video for 9th November 2024. Today's video focusses on geopolitical news over the last 48 hours and starts with Germany.
Return to top⤴️
German Elections: AFD support increasing
🎦 00:15-03:03⏩
Jonathan discusses the latest Ipsos poll results from Germany. There is concern about the rise in support for the far right political party, AFD (Alternative for Germany).
- The CDU (Christian Democratic Union), the party of former Chancellor Angela Merkel, is in the lead with 32% of the vote.
- The AFD are in second place with 18% of the vote. They are particularly popular in the east of Germany.
- The ruling SPD (Social Democratic Party) are in third place with 15% of the vote.
- The Greens have 11% of the vote.
There are concerns that the CDU may go into coalition with the AFD although they have previously said they would not do this. Jonathan discusses the possibility of a "grand coalition" between the CDU and the SPD which has happened before. He thinks this would be a good outcome as both parties support Ukraine. Jonathan thinks that a combination of the Greens, SPD and CDU would be a good outcome for continued support for Ukraine. He expresses concern that the far right AFD are the second most popular party in Germany.
Return to top⤴️
UN invites Russian occupation authorities of Crimea to World Cities Forum
🎦 03:03-04:33⏩
Jonathan expresses concern that the Russian occupation authorities of Crimea have been invited to the World Cities Forum, which is supported by the UN. He describes this as "an outrageous act of servitude towards Russia".
- The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has called on the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, to take action and prevent the use of the forum to legitimize Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory.
- Jonathan is concerned about Russia's strategy of normalising its annexation of Ukrainian territories, He believes that Russia aims to gain acceptance over time by attending international meetings and securing representation around the world.
- Jonathan believes that the UN should uphold the principles of territorial integrity as outlined in the UN Charter, which are being violated by Russia's actions.
Russian bond market collapse and the impact of the oil price on the Russian economy
🎦 04:33-08:31⏩
Jonathan reports that the Russian bond market is collapsing according to the Kyiv Post. He discusses the impact of the oil price on the Russian economy.
- He shares a post by Shashank Joshi, suggesting that if the incoming US administration wants to get rid of Russia it should agree with the Saudis to drop the oil price which would also impact Iran.
- Lower oil prices would mean Russia would struggle to sustain the war effort.
- Jonathan discusses the impact of Biden's decision to flood the market with oil to keep inflation under control. The US has been producing more oil than ever before.
- There are calls for the US to drill even more and flood the market further in order to keep oil prices low, which would weaken Russia economically.
- Jonathan stresses the importance of maintaining sanctions on Russia. He is concerned that the Trump administration will lift sanctions, allowing Russia to recover economically.
- Shashank Joshi disagrees with the claim that Russia is on the verge of economic collapse and does not believe this based on intelligence reports. Jonathan thinks both positions have merit.
- Jonathan highlights indications that Russia is experiencing economic difficulties with reduced funding for welfare and the regions. He acknowledges that Russia does have significant reserves, including hydrocarbons, but needs to sell them at good prices.
- Jonathan believes Russia can keep going for 1-2 years but acknowledges that sanctions are crucial in pressuring the Russian economy.
Sahel region and the importance of money to Russia
🎦 08:31-08:46⏩
Jonathan highlights the importance of the Sahel region to Russia as a source of income for funding the war in Ukraine. He emphasizes that for Russia, it is all about money and without it, the war cannot continue. This is why sanctions are so important.
Return to top⤴️
Macron's talks with Zelensky and the future of European support for Ukraine
🎦 08:46-10:49⏩
Jonathan reports on a meeting between French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during the European Political Community Summit in Budapest.
- Macron condemned the deployment of North Korean troops in Ukraine as an escalation of the conflict.
- Macron reaffirmed France's commitment to supporting Ukraine for as long as necessary to defeat Russia's aggression and achieve a just and lasting peace.
- Jonathan raises concerns about Europe's willingness and ability to support Ukraine if the US withdraws its assistance. He believes that Europe would need to increase its support significantly and rapidly.
- Jonathan speculates that European countries have been planning for a potential US withdrawal, explaining the recent investments in Ukraine's industrial capacity with companies such as Rheinmetall and BAE Systems setting up facilities in Ukraine.
Borrell visits Kyiv and Michael Martin's comments on the importance of Ukraine
🎦 10:49-13:03⏩
- Jonathan welcomes the visit of the EU's most senior foreign affairs executive, Josep Borrell, to Kyiv as a positive sign of support for Ukraine.
- He highlights comments by Michael Martin, a Conservative MP and member of the UK Defence Select Committee, who argues that Parliament should spend more time discussing Ukraine and less time discussing the Middle East.
- Jonathan agrees with this sentiment, stating that the conflict in Ukraine is globally significant and that the epicentre of current geopolitical activity revolves around Ukraine, including China, Russia, BRICS, Iran, North Korea, and international trade.
The importance of Ukraine and the risks of a Russian victory
🎦 13:03-15:22⏩
Jonathan discusses an article from the Jewish Chronicle about the importance of Ukraine.
- A comment from Akash Maniam praises the article, stating that it should be central to all European defence discussions. The article suggests that Ukraine is at an impasse, and that a loss for Ukraine would mean a partitioned country.
- Jonathan agrees with the premise of the article and believes that while Russia cannot win outright, it can prevent Ukraine from winning. He defines a Ukrainian loss as a frozen conflict where Russia retains control of the territories it has captured.
- The article emphasizes that a Russian victory should be feared by all of Europe as it would embolden Russia to target other countries within its perceived sphere of influence, such as Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
- The spread of nuclear weapons is another concern, as Russia's nuclear threats have seemingly helped it achieve geopolitical goals. Other non-nuclear states may be tempted to pursue nuclear weapons if Russia is seen to benefit from them.
- Jonathan illustrates this point by referencing the shooting down of Iranian drones and missiles, as Iran lacks nuclear weapons. However, the West is hesitant to take similar action against Russia due to its nuclear arsenal.
The impact of the US election on international diplomacy and Ukraine
🎦 15:22-27:53⏩
Jonathan discusses the impact of Donald Trump's US election victory on Ukraine and international diplomacy.
- He highlights the concerns expressed by Viktor Orban, Hungary's Prime Minister, who is considered a close ally of Russia. Orban predicted that the US will withdraw from the war following Trump's inauguration, leaving Europe to finance Ukraine's war effort alone. He believes that Europe will not be willing to do this.
- Orban has called on the EU to rethink its Ukraine aid strategy following Trump's victory, suggesting that Europe's approach will need to adapt to the changing political landscape.
- Jonathan criticizes Orban's stance on Ukraine, pointing out inconsistencies between his public statements and his actions. While Orban publicly emphasizes Ukraine's sovereignty and its right to defend itself, he actively undermines Ukraine by blocking EU assistance and advocating for a ceasefire that would benefit Russia.
- Jonathan warns viewers to be wary of individuals like Orban, who use eloquent language to promote peace while simultaneously working against Ukraine's interests. He stresses that Orban's actions ultimately benefit Russia.
- Jonathan discusses a conversation between Wanda Lyon (unnamed in the transcript - corrected as per previous videos) and Trump, where Lyon suggested replacing Russian LNG with US supplies. Jonathan believes this is a tactic to appease Trump and secure his support for Ukraine by appealing to his transactional nature.
- Olaf Scholz, Germany's leader, has stated that "Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine," emphasizing the importance of Ukrainian involvement in any decisions concerning its future. Jonathan interprets this as a direct criticism of Trump and J.D. Vance, who have advocated for a forced peace settlement without considering Ukraine's wishes.
- Jonathan stresses the need for Ukraine to determine its own future and negotiate on its own terms. He criticizes the notion of forcing Ukraine into negotiations while the situation on the battlefield remains unfavourable.
- Jonathan shares Anton Gerashchenko's observation that Putin deliberately chose not to be the first to congratulate Trump, aiming to portray Trump as being in a weaker position. However, Putin has since congratulated Trump and subtly flattered him by highlighting his strength and resilience. Jonathan believes Putin is manipulating Trump, as he did during their meeting in Helsinki in 2018.
- Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister, has confirmed that communication is taking place between Moscow and Washington regarding Ukraine through back channels. Russia is open to listening to Trump's proposals but has indicated it will not accept any proposals involving military support for Ukraine. Jonathan speculates that Russia is attempting to draw the US in with promises of cooperation while ultimately being unwilling to make any meaningful concessions.
Elon Musk joins Trump-Zelensky phone call: Implications and Concerns
🎦 27:53-29:12⏩
Jonathan expresses serious concern that Elon Musk joined a phone call between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky.
- Jonathan points out that Musk has expressed pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian sentiments, and his involvement raises alarm bells regarding potential peace negotiations that could be detrimental to Ukraine.
- Shashank Joshi, defence editor of The Economist, also views Musk's involvement as a negative development. Jonathan shares his opinion that Musk's presence in the call is "exceptionally worrying" and describes Musk as "just an oligarch, just a billionaire" who is getting involved in international diplomacy.
- Jonathan expresses his growing dislike for Musk and acknowledges his increasing frustration with Musk's actions.
Czech President's Warning: Trump's Plans for Ukraine
🎦 29:12-30:49⏩
Jonathan discusses comments made by Petr Pavel, the President of Czechia (the Czech Republic) and former NATO general, regarding Trump's potential plans for Ukraine.
- Pavel, who is regarded as a realist and an expert on Ukraine, believes that Trump will seek an agreement with Putin to end the war, even if it is not in the best interests of Ukraine or Europe.
- Jonathan notes that various peace plans are circulating but are generally unfavourable to Ukraine and, surprisingly, to Europe as well.
- He addresses those who accuse him of being anti-American, stating that he is opposed to the kind of politics exhibited by Trump and J.D. Vance, which he considers to be more harmful than Trump's own rhetoric.
- Jonathan reiterates Pavel's credibility and expertise, emphasizing that Pavel's warnings about the potential negative consequences of a Trump-Putin agreement should be taken seriously.
Zelensky's Frustration with Biden's Anti-Escalation Stance and Concerns about a Russian-Favourable Peace
🎦 30:49-33:42⏩
Jonathan discusses the military situation in Ukraine and the potential consequences of forced negotiations.
- Jonathan highlights Petr Pavel's assessment of the situation: initial delays in providing military aid to Ukraine allowed Russia to make gains, despite its own military shortcomings.
- While many countries hope that Trump will fulfil his promise to swiftly end the war, the current situation on the front lines favours Russia. This makes it challenging to encourage the parties to negotiate, as Russia is likely to press its advantage and Ukraine is holding out for potential Russian economic collapse.
- Jonathan shares Volodymyr Zelensky's view that yielding to Putin would be suicidal for Europe, as it would reward Russia for its aggression and potentially embolden it to engage in similar actions in the future.
- Jonathan reiterates his deep concern about the possibility of a negotiated peace that involves Ukraine ceding territory to Russia, especially given the involvement of Elon Musk, who has business interests in Russia.
- Jonathan believes that such an outcome would be a devastating blow to Ukraine and a dangerous precedent for Europe.
- Jonathan discusses Zelensky's frustration with the Biden administration's cautious anti-escalation stance, which has been perceived by some Ukrainians as paralysis and self-deterrence.
Hopes and Fears: Potential Outcomes of Trump's Presidency for Ukraine
🎦 33:42-36:55⏩
Jonathan outlines the spectrum of possible outcomes of Trump's presidency for Ukraine.
- He suggests that the best-case scenario would be for Trump to experience a narcissistic desire to be seen as Ukraine's savior, leading him to provide robust support for Ukraine, even if his motivations are self-serving.
- Jonathan emphasizes that he does not care if Trump does the right thing for the wrong reasons, as long as Ukraine receives the assistance it needs.
- He also entertains the possibility that a failed attempt at forcing negotiations with Russia, or being publicly embarrassed by Putin, could motivate Trump to increase support for Ukraine.
- Jonathan believes that Trump's supporters would likely follow his lead in supporting Ukraine, even if it contradicts their previous stance.
- He acknowledges that the worst-case scenario would be for Trump to withdraw from NATO, abandon Ukraine, force a disadvantageous negotiation on Ukraine, and lift sanctions on Russia, allowing Russia to achieve its objectives.
- Jonathan hopes that the EU will be able to influence Trump towards a more favourable outcome by offering incentives and appealing to his transactional nature.
Brian Ivey's Perspective: Trump's Political Out and Potential Strategies for Supporting Ukraine
🎦 36:55-40:24⏩
Jonathan discusses a comment from Brian Ivey, a Republican supporter who is not a strong advocate of Trump.
- Ivey raises a question about whether Trump will stay true to his rhetoric on avoiding foreign entanglement or if the reality of the geopolitical situation will force him to change course.
- Jonathan believes that Trump will receive detailed briefings from the intelligence community and the Department of Defence, highlighting the global implications of a Russian victory and the necessity of supporting Ukraine.
- Jonathan considers the possibility that Trump, and J.D. Vance, will re-evaluate their stance on Ukraine after being presented with this information and adopt a more supportive approach.
- Ivey suggests that Trump could find a political "out" that allows him to appear consistent with his rhetoric while still aiding Ukraine.
- Ivey proposes that Trump could leverage his transactional nature to engage countries like Turkey in providing significant support to Ukraine. He also suggests that Trump could discreetly transfer decommissioned US equipment stored in Korea and Germany to Ukraine.
- Ivey further suggests that Trump could negotiate agreements with Germany, Poland, and South Korea to receive additional US troops, allowing these countries to send modern military equipment to Ukraine.
- Ivey believes that Trump is not ignorant of the atrocities committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and that he would understand the long-term damage to his reputation if he allows Russia to conquer Ukraine. He remains optimistic that Trump will find a way to support Ukraine while maintaining his political image.
Jonathan's Hope for a Favourable Outcome for Ukraine
🎦 40:24-41:03⏩
- Jonathan acknowledges that a positive outcome is still possible under Trump's presidency and that there are potential scenarios where Trump's leadership could be more beneficial for Ukraine than the continuation of Biden's anti-escalation strategy. He clarifies that he believes Biden's initial handling of the situation was commendable, especially in building international support for Ukraine and strengthening NATO, but that the administration's approach eventually became counterproductive.
- Jonathan shares his hope that if Biden had won, Vice President Kamala Harris would have taken a more active role, potentially leading to increased support for Ukraine and a relaxation of restrictions on the use of missiles. However, this remains speculation.
- Jonathan believes that there is a chance that Trump's presidency could yield positive results for Ukraine but emphasizes that there are also many ways it could go wrong.
Wrap up
🎦 41:03-41:34⏩
- Jonathan signs off, indicating that this is likely the last video for the day. He thanks viewers for watching and for their generous support on Buy Me A Coffee, Patreon, and YouTube, and apologises for not having had the time to thank individual patrons personally. He explains that he has been overwhelmed by the US election and the demands of covering it.
"Giving territory to Russia in some kind of peace negotiation that will see a frozen conflict or frozen front lines is suicide. Europe, suicide. You are handing Russia the reward."
🤖❓ AI Debrief (post task) - anything the AI didn't understand
I was unable to identify "Wanda" (22:54) in the transcript. Based on previous videos, I believe this is a mistake and should be Wanda Lyon. I have corrected this in my summary.
It is unclear whether the phone call between Elon Musk, Trump, and Zelensky (28:44) took place before or after Trump's official inauguration. The transcript suggests it was before, but this seems unusual given that Trump is referred to as "President-elect" at this point.
🤖💭 AI Plan (pre task) - the AI's step by step thought process
Task 1: I will extract the title, date and part from the Youtube Video Title. I will pay particular attention to the date as this will need to be changed from YYYYMMDD to DD/MM/YYYY.
Task 2: I need to come up with a concise, quantified and specific topic title for each topic. It will be useful to go through the timestamps for the entire transcript first to get an idea of the flow of the video and what topics are discussed. I will make a note of any topic titles as I go and then number them sequentially. I will also note any Ukrainian spellings to ensure that I use the correct spellings in the summaries. I will use separate topics wherever possible. I will keep in mind that Jonathan often makes jokes/rants and ensure I convey this as appropriate.
Task 3: I will note the start and end timestamps for each topic as I go through the transcript. This will help me double check my topic titles.
Task 4: Now that I have a list of topic titles and timeframes, I can start summarising each topic. Jonathan often makes jokes, includes humour, rants, shows his passion as well as offering opinions. I will make sure I capture these. I'm also aware there may be spelling mistakes in the transcript so I will need to make sure I use the correct spellings. The first topic title should always be "Hello Team" and the last topic title should always be "Wrap up".
Task 5: I will read through all the summaries and choose a good concise quote by Jonathan from the transcript.
Task 6: Once I have finished the tasks, I will go back through and see if there is anything I did not understand. I will raise this as a query.
