US Politics BUMPER Election Extra: Harris - Trump Showdown Update

"He's so fragile. His ego is so fragile that he has to have bigger crowds. He has to be the best at everything and that's the way he comforts himself. That's the way he self-validates here is like oh she's a woman..."

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-01:28⏩

Jonathan welcomes viewers to a bumper election update video covering the Democratic National Convention (DNC) but he will cover it separately in another video. He mentions the marked difference between the Republican National Convention (RNC) and the DNC in terms of how serious each party is about policy and governing. He also promises that his next video will provide a full analysis of the DNC.

Return to top⤴️

Importance of demographics in US election

🎦 01:28-02:48⏩

Jonathan highlights the significance of understanding how different demographics are likely to vote. He explains that every comment, speech or action needs to be assessed in terms of its potential effect on various groups, including older and younger voters, people of different races and ethnicities, religious groups, independents, and registered and likely voters for each party. He points out that certain parties are more appealing to specific demographics and that the question is whether candidates can persuade these groups to support them.

Return to top⤴️

Suzanne Melendi's comment on Trump and Harris campaigns

🎦 02:50-03:13⏩

Jonathan reads a comment from Suzanne Melendi, who observes that Trump is essentially preaching to his existing base without any real effort to expand it. She contrasts this with the Harris campaign, which she believes is doing a better job of reaching out to diverse voices and creating a sense of unity. Suzanne claims to be happy to have been wrong about her initial assessments of both campaigns.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's vote share and strategy

🎦 03:19-04:25⏩

Jonathan discusses Trump's relatively stable vote share, which is stuck between 40 and 46 percent. He posits that Trump's strategy is to attempt to peel away some of Harris's voters by employing a "scorched earth" approach of negativity and personal attacks. Jonathan suggests that this strategy is counterproductive and destructive, as it does not offer a positive vision for the future of the country.

Return to top⤴️

Pod Save America team's analysis of Trump's campaign

🎦 04:40-05:58⏩

Jonathan refers to a discussion by the Pod Save America team, which echoes his analysis. They point out that Trump's vote share has been stagnant throughout the campaign, despite major events like an assassination attempt and a debate with Biden. They believe that Trump's only path to victory is to resort to negativity and attempt to demoralize Harris's supporters. This negativity, they argue, is likely to include personal attacks on both Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz. They emphasize that this strategy is destructive and lacks any kind of positive vision for the country.

Return to top⤴️

Nikki Haley voters and Harris's expansionist campaign

🎦 07:37-08:41⏩

Jonathan discusses a Guardian article (admittedly a left-wing newspaper) reporting on Nikki Haley voters who are now supporting Kamala Harris. He mentions that Haley attempted to sue the Guardian for using her name in this context but these voters claim they are "never Trumpers" and are voting for Harris as a much better alternative to Trump. Jonathan argues that Harris's campaign is more expansionist in its outreach, targeting groups beyond her core base. This contrasts with Trump's isolationist approach, which focuses on solidifying his existing base.

Return to top⤴️

Republican support for Harris and the GOP's panic

🎦 08:41-09:15⏩

Jonathan highlights the growing trend of Republican voters openly supporting Harris. He mentions Adam Kinzinger and a Georgian lawmaker (possibly the mayor) who have spoken at the DNC. He suggests that these developments are putting the GOP in a state of panic.

Return to top⤴️

Pennsylvania GOP leaders' support for Harris

🎦 09:22-10:53⏩

Jonathan reports on a stunning announcement of local GOP leaders in Pennsylvania who are banding together to support Harris. He explains that their decision is driven by their belief that Trump is a threat to democracy. He mentions a specific GOP leader who is facing a disciplinary hearing for endorsing Harris, a decision that he stands by, even if it means being ousted from his position. Jonathan highlights this as a sign that even within the GOP, there is a growing awareness of Trump's dangerous tendencies.

Return to top⤴️

Moderate Republicans and Trump's need to win every vote

🎦 10:53-11:28⏩

Jonathan argues that Trump needs to win every single vote he won in 2020 and more to secure victory. He emphasizes that moderate Republicans, particularly those who identify with Reagan's legacy, are crucial to his success. Jonathan points out that Trump's current approach is likely to alienate these voters, making it even more difficult to achieve his goals.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's campaign shakeup and the rise of Corey Lewandowski

🎦 11:40-13:58⏩

Jonathan discusses a significant shakeup in Trump's campaign. He mentions that Trump's two moderate Republican campaign managers, Lasavita and Wiles, have been replaced by Corey Lewandowski. Jonathan expresses his concern about this move, pointing out Lewandowski's troubling history, including allegations of sexual assault, battery charges, and inflammatory rhetoric. He also highlights Lewandowski's previous role in the Trump campaign and the problematic figures who have been brought back into the fold, such as Paul Manafort.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's attacks on veterans and the Medal of Freedom

🎦 13:58-14:14⏩

Jonathan highlights Trump's latest attack on veterans, where he dismissed Medal of Honor recipients as "dead or in bad shape." He contrasts this with the Medal of Freedom, which he awarded to billionaire megadonor Miriam Edelson. Trump claims that the Medal of Freedom is a higher honor because recipients are typically fit and healthy. Jonathan criticizes this as a ludicrous comparison, pointing out that the Medal of Honor is awarded for acts of valor and sacrifice, while the Medal of Freedom is often given to individuals for achievements in other areas.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's narcissistic nature and lack of empathy

🎦 14:14-15:32⏩

Jonathan attributes Trump's recent comments about veterans and the Medal of Freedom to his deep-seated narcissism and lack of empathy. He argues that Trump is incapable of understanding the sacrifice behind the Medal of Honor, as he only sees things in terms of how they benefit him personally. He points out that Trump's constant need to be the best at everything, even in areas where he has no experience, is a sign of his fragile ego. Jonathan concludes by saying that anyone who defends Trump's comments is simply insane.

Return to top⤴️

Taylor Swift's potential endorsement and Trump's AI-generated images

🎦 15:32-15:58⏩
,35:46-37:30⏩

Jonathan discusses the anticipated endorsement of Taylor Swift, a mega-star who is expected to support Democrats. He then highlights Trump's attempt to claim support from "Swifties" by posting AI-generated images of Swift supporters on True Social. Jonathan points out that these images are fake and that the article he links to is satire. He criticizes Trump's failure to recognize the obvious deception and his ongoing obsession with crowd sizes and personal insults.

Return to top⤴️

Democrats' use of videos showing Trump's poor rally attendance

🎦 37:30-39:09⏩

Jonathan highlights the Democrats' use of videos showing Trump's poor rally attendance. He mentions examples of videos showing empty seats and people leaving Trump's rallies while Tim Walz is filling stadiums in Nebraska. He argues that these videos are not random and reflect a genuine lack of enthusiasm for Trump's campaign.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's response to videos of poor rally attendance

🎦 39:09-39:44⏩

Jonathan discusses Trump's response to the videos showing poor rally attendance. Trump claims that these videos are misleading and that he had to turn away thousands of people at a rally in Pennsylvania. Jonathan argues that this is another example of Trump's misfiring brain and pathetic attempt to deflect criticism. He urges Trump to "get over it" and move on.

Return to top⤴️

Trump and the Republicans' need to focus on substance

🎦 39:44-40:26⏩

Jonathan argues that Trump and the Republicans need to focus on substance and policy, rather than personal attacks and distractions. He suggests they should be talking about the economy, immigration, and their vision for the future of the country. He criticizes their lack of tangible solutions and their reliance on negativity and fear-mongering.

Return to top⤴️

Fox News's awkward response to Trump's economic speech

🎦 40:26-41:07⏩

Jonathan points out the awkwardness of Fox News quickly removing the chyron (ticker) showing the Dow having a record day as Trump was speaking about the economy. He sees this as a sign of discomfort, as Fox News is forced to downplay positive economic news while Trump is denigrating Democrats. He highlights this as an example of Trump's campaign's disconnect from reality.

Return to top⤴️

Harris-Waltz campaign's effective social media strategy

🎦 41:07-43:12⏩

Jonathan praises the Harris-Waltz campaign's effective social media strategy. He describes their team as "let off the leash" and incredibly creative, producing witty and pointed content that is resonating with audiences. He cites examples of social media posts that subtly mock Trump's incoherent pronouncements and lack of substance.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's "incoherent rambling" and lies about job creation

🎦 43:12-44:58⏩

Jonathan criticizes Trump's "incoherent rambling" at a rally, where he made the false claim that virtually all job creation in the past year had gone to migrants. He points out that this is a blatant lie and that Trump's lack of basic understanding of math is concerning. Jonathan expresses his disbelief that anyone would still consider voting for Trump, given his demonstrably false statements.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's "inflation speech" involving Tic Tacs

🎦 45:20-48:50⏩

Jonathan recounts Trump's rambling "inflation speech" at a golf club. He highlights the absurdity of Trump using a box of Tic Tacs as a prop to illustrate inflation. Jonathan argues that Trump's approach is not only ineffective but also insulting to voters. He criticizes the entire campaign for its lack of seriousness and its tendency to treat voters like children. Jonathan points out that even the Pod Save America team found Trump's speech incredibly stupid.

Return to top⤴️

Kamala Harris's economic speech and her focus on affordability

🎦 49:57-51:26⏩

Jonathan contrasts Trump's "inflation speech" with Kamala Harris's upcoming economic policy speech, which will focus on affordability. He highlights Harris's commitment to addressing the high cost of living, including initiatives to lower the cost of groceries and everyday expenses, as well as her plan to create three million housing units by offering tax incentives for builders. He expresses his approval of these policies and acknowledges that they are likely to resonate with voters.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's late entry into the race and her ability to give effective speeches

🎦 51:26-52:17⏩

Jonathan acknowledges Harris's late entry into the race, which has put her at a disadvantage in terms of giving economic speeches. He points out that a typical candidate would have given at least 12 economic speeches by this point in the campaign. Despite this, he is confident that Harris will deliver an effective speech at the DNC.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's continued praise for dictators and his obsession with strength

🎦 52:17-53:20⏩

Jonathan expresses his concern about Trump's continued praise for dictators, specifically the Hungarian Prime Minister. He argues that Trump's obsession with "strong men" is a personality defect and that it is dangerous to befriend and admire individuals who suppress democracy. He highlights the hypocrisy of Trump's desire for his own followers to be unquestioningly obedient, as he has shown admiration for authoritarian leaders.

Return to top⤴️

The GOP's efforts to challenge election results in Georgia

🎦 53:20-54:53⏩

Jonathan discusses a recent change to Georgia election rules proposed by Cleta Mitchell, who aided Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election. He emphasizes that this is just one example of the GOP's efforts to challenge election results. He warns of a potential fight for democracy in November, with the GOP prepared to challenge everything if they don't win. Jonathan argues that the GOP's obsession with claiming that Democrats can't win without cheating is ironic, given that there are more registered Democrats in the US. He concludes that higher voter turnout will likely benefit Democrats.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's rejection of Project 2025 and the evidence of his knowledge

🎦 54:53-55:57⏩

Jonathan brings up Trump's rejection of Project 2025, his own team's policy agenda. He notes that Trump claimed to be unaware of the contents of Project 2025, despite being co-authored by his own team. He argues that Trump's denial is a blatant lie, and he cites the fact that Russell Vought, the co-author and former Trump administration official, confirmed that Trump was fully aware of the project. Jonathan sees this as another example of Trump's dishonesty and his ability to shift blame when things go wrong.

Return to top⤴️

Fred Trump III's claims about Trump's dementia

🎦 55:57-58:10⏩

Jonathan discusses Fred Trump III's claims about his uncle's dementia, which he believes is a recurring issue in the Trump family. He suggests that Trump's recent incoherent speeches and bizarre statements are indicative of dementia, rather than simple aging. He cites Fred's observations of his grandfather and aunt, both of whom exhibited signs of dementia. Jonathan argues that Trump's declining mental state is a cause for concern, particularly given the position of power he holds.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's security detail and his complaints about the assassination attempt

🎦 58:10-59:08⏩

Jonathan reveals that Trump actually receives far more security protection than is recommended for someone in his position. He mentions a Washington Post article that revealed information from two Secret Service officials familiar with Trump's security details. This information contradicts Trump's constant complaints about the assassination attempt and his demands for more protection. Jonathan concludes that Trump's claims are exaggerated and misleading.

Return to top⤴️

Harris and Walz's "rough and ready" speeches

🎦 59:08-01:01⏩
:07
Jonathan praises Harris and Walz's "rough and ready" speeches, which he says are authentic and impassioned. He contrasts this with Trump's reliance on teleprompters and his tendency to deliver scripted speeches. He argues that Harris and Walz's speeches are more engaging and connect with voters on a deeper level. Jonathan specifically highlights Harris's use of repetition in her speeches, which he compares to a pastor delivering a sermon. He observes that both candidates are improving their public speaking skills and are able to connect with audiences in a genuine and authentic way.

Return to top⤴️

Project 2025 projected onto Trump building in Chicago

🎦 01:01:07-01:01⏩
:37⏩
Jonathan mentions that Project 2025 was projected onto Trump building in Chicago along with other messages. He compares this to the work of Led by Donkeys, a British organization known for projecting messages onto public buildings.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's praise for Elon Musk and his firing of striking workers

🎦 01:01:37-01:03⏩
:37⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump's praise for Elon Musk, specifically his firing of striking workers at Tesla. He questions whether Trump's support for such tactics would resonate with working-class voters. He points out that Musk moved Tesla from California to Texas to avoid stricter worker rights regulations. Jonathan also mentions the potential for the EU to close Twitter in Europe due to Musk's failure to comply with their laws. He highlights the financial implications of Musk's Twitter acquisition and the potential for banks to seize the platform. He criticizes Trump for endorsing Musk's management style, which prioritizes efficiency over worker rights.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's fundraising from selling signed bibles

🎦 01:03:37-01:05⏩
:22⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump's fundraising efforts, which included selling signed bibles for $1000. He questions the ethics of this practice, noting that many Christians, including evangelicals, are critical of Trump for using religion for personal gain. He points out that despite Trump's claims, he is not truly a Christian.

Return to top⤴️

Senate polls and Harris's lead over Trump

🎦 01:05:22-01:08⏩
:34⏩
Jonathan provides a compilation of senate polls from August 2024, showing Harris's lead over Trump in key battleground states. He mentions that these polls show that Harris is not only winning but also outperforming Biden. He suggests that this is a sign of her strength as a candidate. He also highlights Harris's strong performance with Latino voters, showing a significant increase in support since the previous poll.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's lead over Trump in key battleground states

🎦 01:08:34-01:09⏩
:34⏩
Jonathan reiterates Harris's lead over Trump in key battleground states based on recent polls. He emphasizes that while these polls are averages over time, the most recent polls are particularly revealing. He notes that while many polls show a close race, Harris appears to be ahead in crucial states. He also mentions that Rasmussen, a pollster known for its Republican skew, is showing Harris ahead in Pennsylvania. He highlights the fact that even Rasmussen, a pollster favored by Trump, is showing Harris ahead in critical states. Jonathan concludes that the polls are showing a clear trend in Harris's favor.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's election odds and JD Vance's response

🎦 01:09:34-01:13⏩
:34⏩
Jonathan discusses Harris's growing election odds. He cites Polymarket, a prediction market, showing Harris with an 8-point lead over Trump nationwide. He then highlights JD Vance's response to the polls, which he describes as dismissive. Vance claims that while the polls show a momentum shift in Harris's favor, he remains confident in his own campaign's strategy. Jonathan points out the disconnect between the national polls and Vance's internal polls, suggesting that Vance is refusing to acknowledge the reality of the situation.

Return to top⤴️

JD Vance's strategy and the importance of addressing inflation

🎦 01:13:34-01:14⏩
:02⏩
Jonathan discusses Vance's strategy, which he believes is flawed. He argues that Vance should be focusing on addressing inflation, which is a major concern for voters. He suggests that Vance should highlight how Trump's policies helped to lower inflation in the past and contrast this with the current state of the economy. Jonathan believes that Vance's current approach of blaming the Democrats for inflation is ineffective. He points out that the US has a relatively low inflation rate compared to other countries and that the Democrats should be taking credit for this. He also emphasizes that the Democrats should be highlighting the fact that America is a better place to live than other countries, especially in terms of inflation.

Return to top⤴️

Media's use of fake polls to suppress Republican turnout

🎦 01:14:02-01:14⏩
:44⏩
Jonathan mentions a common claim made by Trump and his supporters, which is that the media uses fake polls to suppress Republican turnout. He points out that this claim has been made in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. He suggests that the media uses fake polls to create dissent and conflict within the Republican Party and that this is a common tactic. He dismisses this claim and argues that the Trump campaign is in a strong position to win the election.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's lead in new poll and the announcement of a VP debate

🎦 01:14:44-01:15⏩
:07⏩
Jonathan shares a new poll from Remington Research showing Harris with an 8-point lead over Trump. He then mentions the announcement of a VP debate between Vance and Walz, scheduled for October 1st, and hosted by CBS News. He sees this as positive news for voters, as it will provide an opportunity to see how the candidates compare on issues.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's hiring of Tulsi Gabbard for debate preparation

🎦 01:15:07-01:15⏩
:50⏩
Jonathan reports that Trump has hired Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat who has become a conspiracy theorist and Kremlin propagandist, to prepare him for the VP debate against Harris. He cites a New York Times article reporting on this development. He suggests that Trump's decision to hire Gabbard is a sign of his desperation and his reliance on individuals who have attacked Harris in the past.

Return to top⤴️

Tim Walz's effective communication and his connection with young people

🎦 01:15:50-01:16⏩
:59⏩
Jonathan praises Tim Walz's communication skills, particularly his ability to connect with young people. He highlights Walz's visit to a high school football practice, where he gave an inspiring speech to the students. Jonathan argues that Walz's enthusiasm and ability to relate to young people is a valuable asset to the Democratic Party. He contrasts this with Trump's and Vance's campaign events, which he describes as poorly attended and lacking in genuine enthusiasm.

Return to top⤴️

Kamala Harris and Tim Walz's "normal" connection with voters

🎦 01:16:59-01:18⏩
:39⏩
Jonathan emphasizes the importance of candidates connecting with voters on a personal level and he argues that Harris and Walz are doing a much better job of this than Trump and Vance. He highlights a clip of a conversation between Harris and Walz, where they discuss their shared background and their desire to represent everyday people. He contrasts this with Trump's and Vance's interactions, which he describes as lacking in genuine warmth and sincerity. Jonathan suggests that Harris and Walz's "normal" connection with voters is a powerful tool in their campaign.

Return to top⤴️

Harris and Walz's music tastes and their connection to everyday Americans

🎦 01:18:39-01:20⏩
:46⏩
Jonathan shares a conversation between Harris and Walz about their favorite music. He highlights the fact that both candidates are fans of artists who are popular with everyday Americans. He suggests that this is another way in which Harris and Walz are connecting with voters on a personal level. He contrasts this with Trump's and Vance's campaign events, which he says are alienating to many voters. Jonathan concludes that the Democrats are doing a good job of showcasing their human side and demonstrating their connection to everyday Americans.

Return to top⤴️

Republican attacks on Tim Walz and the concept of "reverse racism"

🎦 01:20:46-01:21⏩
:54⏩
Jonathan discusses the Republicans' attempt to attack Tim Walz for his casual conversation with Kamala Harris. He mentions that they are accusing Walz of "reverse racism." He points out that this is a ludicrous accusation and highlights the absurdity of their claim. Jonathan finds it humorous that the Republicans are attempting to use the concept of "reverse racism" against Walz, who is openly embracing a conversation about everyday life. He suggests that this is a sign of the Republicans' desperation and their lack of real issues to campaign on.

Return to top⤴️

The importance of normalcy in politics and the contrasting styles of Harris, Walz, and Trump

🎦 01:21:54-01:23⏩
:44⏩
Jonathan continues to discuss the importance of normalcy in politics and he highlights the contrasting styles of Harris, Walz, and Trump. He argues that Trump's "otherness" and strangeness are undermining his attempts to portray himself as a man of the people. He believes that Harris and Walz's normalcy is a powerful tool in their campaign. Jonathan's analysis is interrupted by a viewer who disagrees with his assessment of the strategy. The viewer argues that while he agrees that Harris and Walz's normalcy is effective, he is concerned about strategies that are designed to trigger Trump. He believes that these strategies are too complex and require too much context for voters to understand. He suggests that simpler strategies, such as humor and mockery, are more effective. Jonathan responds by agreeing with the viewer's assessment of Harris and Walz's approach. He argues that their ability to dismiss Trump's attacks with a smile and a laugh is a powerful strategy. He believes that this tactic is more effective than getting serious and engaging in heated debates. Jonathan concludes by stating that Harris has effectively shifted the focus of the campaign away from Trump and that this is a key to her success.

Return to top⤴️

Harris and Walz's "everyday people" approach to campaigning

🎦 01:23:44-01:25⏩
:14⏩
Jonathan highlights the "everyday people" approach of Harris and Walz. He mentions that they are working the phones in Pennsylvania themselves, demonstrating their commitment to grassroots campaigning. He contrasts this with Trump's and Vance's more detached and elitist style of campaigning. Jonathan believes that Harris and Walz's willingness to connect with voters on a personal level is a major advantage in the election.

Return to top⤴️

JD Vance's comment on Trump's faithfulness and the Marine Corps motto

🎦 01:25:14-01:27⏩
:10⏩
Jonathan reads a comment from a Marine who criticizes Trump's lack of faithfulness to the country and his history of lying and dodging the draft. The commenter also points out Trump's history of infidelity. Jonathan then discusses the Marine Corps motto, "Semper Fidelis," which he believes is a powerful symbol of dedication and loyalty. He argues that Trump's actions and words contradict the values represented by the motto. He concludes that Trump is not a true representative of the Marine Corps, despite his attempts to claim their support.

Return to top⤴️

The Democrats' momentum and the lack of enthusiasm for the Republicans

🎦 01:27:10-01:27⏩
:52⏩
Jonathan concludes the video by highlighting the Democrats' momentum in the election. He attributes this to the effective campaigning of Harris and Walz and the lack of enthusiasm for Trump and Vance's campaign. He notes that the Republicans are struggling to gain traction and that the polls are reflecting a clear shift in public opinion. Jonathan expresses his doubts about the Republicans' ability to regain momentum and secure a victory.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap Up

🎦 01:27:52-01:27⏩
:52⏩
Jonathan thanks viewers for indulging him and says he will speak soon.

Return to top⤴️