US Politics BUMPER Election WEEKLY Extra: Harris - Trump Showdown Update

“This is someone who's not very comfortable, as you wouldn't be, talking about transgender issues, is not going to be an easy thing to do. It's a bit of a quagmire, although actually speaking to that audience would be fairly easy. It's just like, they're all terrible humans. I'm going to get rid of them. Wipe out trans issues or something.”

Hello Team

🎦 00:00-01:43⏩

Jonathan welcomes viewers to another ATP Geopolitics video. He explains that this video will cover a US election update, specifically a Trump-Harris showdown. Jonathan shares his biases, stating that his support leans towards the Democrat side due to his views on foreign policy and the Russia-Ukraine war. He highlights that Trump’s supporters often lean towards a pro-Russia and anti-Ukraine stance, mentioning figures like J.D. Vance, Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Paul Gosar, Steve Bannon and Steve Miller, who have all expressed pro-Russia and anti-Ukraine views. He also mentions Trump's VP, J.D. Vance, whose son is also anti-Ukraine.

Return to top⤴️

US Election Polling Data

🎦 01:43-05:41⏩

Jonathan discusses a study by Tom Bonier, the CEO of TargetSmart, which analyses US voter registration data. The analysis, which began on July 21st, reveals a significant surge in voter registration among young Black women (175% increase) and young Latinas (150%) compared to four years ago. Tom Bonier states that he has never witnessed such a significant change in voter registration. Jonathan argues that these numbers highlight the Democrats’ success in motivating their base and suggests a potential hard ceiling for Trump's support at around 46%. He believes that Trump needs to appeal to swing voters and independents to win the election and concludes that the data points towards a positive outcome for the Democratic ticket. He also mentions that historically, those who register to vote closer to election day have a higher voter turnout rate.

Return to top⤴️

Voter Registration Data - Significance

🎦 05:41-06:59⏩

Jonathan explains the importance of voter registration data compared to traditional polls. While polls indicate voter intentions, voter registration data provides insight into who is actually going to vote. He argues that surges in registration often indicate broader enthusiasm and higher voter turnout rates. He concludes that the data suggests a higher level of enthusiasm for the Democratic ticket.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Reaction to Poll Data

🎦 07:06-09:03⏩

Jonathan notes that Trump and his campaign are unhappy with the recent poll results, calling the polling "atrocious." He highlights that Trump's negative reaction to polls that favour Harris is a clear indicator of his concern about the election outcome. He believes that Trump's reaction exemplifies the adage, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

Return to top⤴️

Impact of Poll Results on Electoral Map

🎦 09:03-11:12⏩

Jonathan discusses the impact of the poll results on the electoral map. He highlights the addition of North Carolina as a battleground state, bringing the total number of states in play to seven. He believes that the Harris-Walz campaign is in a better position to secure wins in states like Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia, challenging Trump’s traditional stronghold in the South and Southwest. He highlights that this shift in the electoral map puts Trump in a challenging situation as it requires him to reallocate resources and campaign efforts to secure these states, potentially hurting his chances in other key states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

Return to top⤴️

Polls on Trump's Performance

🎦 11:12-12:12⏩

Jonathan mentions that recent polls suggest that more voters support Harris than Trump. He attributes this to a potential referendum on Trump's presidency and suggests that the results point towards a possible Harris victory. He also emphasizes the importance of voter turnout, acknowledging that the Democrats have an advantage due to their higher number of registered voters.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's Campaign Strategy

🎦 12:12-13:56⏩

Jonathan discusses Harris’s campaign strategy, highlighting her decision to kick off her post-DNC tour in Georgia, a state traditionally seen as a Republican stronghold. He believes that the recent polls have reinforced the decision to expand her campaign map beyond traditional battleground states, targeting states like Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia. He notes that these states were not previously considered winnable for Biden but are now seen as highly competitive. He mentions that Harris and Walz visited Georgia after the DNC to appeal to voters in Republican-leaning counties. He also notes that Harris is gaining support from Black voters, contributing to her success in recent polls.

Return to top⤴️

North Carolina as a Battleground State

🎦 14:09-14:53⏩

Jonathan discusses the shift in North Carolina’s political landscape from lean Republican to toss-up, as reported by the Cook Political Report. He highlights that the Harris-Walz campaign’s focus on this state, along with Minnesota and New Hampshire, signifies their strategy of expanding the electoral map beyond traditional battleground states.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Campaigning Strategy

🎦 15:07-16:23⏩

Jonathan notes that Trump is reportedly not campaigning enough, spending his time at Mar-a-Lago, his golf courses, and on social media. He cites an article that suggests Trump’s aides are concerned about his lack of strategic campaigning and his decline in enthusiasm. He also mentions Trump’s decreased energy and rhetoric at rallies, suggesting that he is less engaged than in the past. He highlights that this lack of campaigning is allowing Harris-Walz to take advantage and campaign in areas outside their comfort zone, chipping away at Republican support.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Campaigning Strategy - Comparison to Obama Campaign

🎦 16:29-17:03⏩

Jonathan draws a parallel between Trump's current campaign strategy and the Obama campaign’s approach in 2012. He highlights Obama's tactic of focusing on smaller margins in traditionally Republican-leaning counties in key battleground states like Ohio, which allowed him to deploy resources to secure larger margins in urban areas. He suggests that Harris-Walz are employing a similar strategy in Georgia, focusing on redder parts of blue counties.

Return to top⤴️

Harris-Walz Campaign Strategy

🎦 17:04-17:57⏩

Jonathan argues that Harris-Walz are employing a more strategic and targeted campaigning approach than Trump, exemplified by their choice of locations and their focus on building a strong team. He highlights their emphasis on showcasing chemistry, energy, and positive vibes, focusing on retail campaigning and engaging with voters in specific counties. He also notes that they are conducting more traditional interview formats.

Return to top⤴️

Harris-Trump Poll Data

🎦 18:05-20:32⏩

Jonathan discusses the latest ABC News Ipsos poll, which shows Harris leading Trump by six points nationally among likely voters. He emphasizes that this lead is significant as it surpasses the margin of error, suggesting that the data is a genuine reflection of current voter sentiment. He acknowledges the limitations of national polls compared to state-level polls but believes that the results are cause for concern for the Trump campaign.

Return to top⤴️

Republican Endorsers for Harris

🎦 20:39-21:46⏩

Jonathan highlights the trend of Republicans endorsing Harris over Trump, citing the example of Judge Luttig, a lifelong conservative judge, who publicly endorsed Harris. He believes that this trend signifies a shift in voter sentiment and could encourage more Republicans to vote for the Democratic ticket. He also emphasizes the symbolic importance of these endorsements, suggesting that they reflect a broader shift in opinion among Republican voters.

Return to top⤴️

Lack of Trump Endorsements

🎦 21:46-22:27⏩

Jonathan discusses the lack of endorsements for Trump, noting that 38 out of 44 people who served in his administration have not endorsed him for re-election. He highlights that this lack of support from his former team is a significant indicator of their dissatisfaction with his presidency. He suggests that this lack of support should raise concerns among voters about Trump’s leadership and potential performance in a second term.

Return to top⤴️

Melania Trump's Lack of Endorsement

🎦 22:34-23:03⏩

Jonathan mentions Melania Trump's absence from the campaign trail and her lack of public endorsement for her husband. He suggests that this is a significant indicator of her personal feelings towards Trump, adding that it is a significant detail that is often overlooked by Republican voters.

Return to top⤴️

John Kelly's Criticism of Trump

🎦 23:03-23:56⏩

Jonathan highlights John Kelly's critical statement about Trump, his former chief of staff, who described him as someone with “no idea what America stands for” and who “admires autocrats and murderous dictators.” He emphasizes the significance of this statement coming from someone who held a position of immense power and trust in Trump's administration.

Return to top⤴️

Swing State Polls

🎦 23:56-25:31⏩

Jonathan discusses swing state polls, mentioning the Morning Consult polls that show Harris leading Trump in states like Arizona, North Carolina, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. He highlights these polls as potential indicators of a shift in voter sentiment in key battleground states.

Return to top⤴️

General Election Polls

🎦 25:31-26:51⏩

Jonathan discusses general election polls, mentioning that Harris is tied with Trump in North Carolina, with a small sample size. He also notes that Trump is leading in Texas, as expected. He discusses the Minnesota poll, which shows Harris leading by five points, but acknowledges that this is down from a previous lead of 10 points. He attributes this potential decline to the waning impact of the DNC bump.

Return to top⤴️

Pollster Ratings

🎦 26:51-27:53⏩

Jonathan discusses the importance of pollster ratings, mentioning Trafalgar as a D-rated pollster known for its right-wing leanings. He highlights the discrepancies between Trafalgar's polls, which show Trump leading in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and other pollsters' findings. He emphasizes that pollster ratings are important for assessing the reliability of poll results.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's Performance in Polls

🎦 27:53-28:51⏩

Jonathan highlights polls that show Harris leading Trump in Michigan and North Carolina. He also notes that the 538 average of polls shows Harris with a 3.2 point lead nationally, but acknowledges that this average is influenced by polls over time. He points out that a significant majority of recent polls show Harris leading Trump, suggesting a positive trend for the Democratic ticket.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Visit to Arlington Cemetery

🎦 29:59-38:27⏩

Jonathan discusses Trump's visit to Arlington Cemetery, highlighting the controversy surrounding his actions. He explains that Trump was invited by Gold Star families to lay a wreath but then chose to go to Section 60 of the cemetery, an area designated for political activities. He mentions that Trump was attempting to stage a photo op but was stopped by an Arlington Cemetery employee. Jonathan shares the US Army's statement rebuking Trump for violating federal laws, regulations, and policies prohibiting political activities on cemetery grounds. He highlights the fact that Trump’s campaign staff accused the employee of being mentally ill after she attempted to enforce the rules, resulting in her being pushed aside. He also mentions the fact that the employee did not press charges due to fear of harassment from Trump’s supporters. Jonathan then discusses the media’s coverage of the event, highlighting Breitbart’s right-wing perspective and Trump's release of statements from Gold Star families defending his actions. He also explores the initial narrative that emerged from the event, which claimed that Harris had declined to attend a memorial event organised by Trump. Jonathan then presents a more accurate account of the event, revealing that Trump had planned in advance to stage a fake memorial, film a political ad, and then attack Harris for not attending. He also notes the reports of Trump's staff pushing the employee aside and making false statements about the incident. He concludes by highlighting the use of the event for political gain by both sides, emphasizing that Trump's actions, rather than Harris’s, were the primary source of the political controversy.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Claims about Kamala Harris's Work History

🎦 38:41-40:20⏩

Jonathan discusses Trump’s claims that Kamala Harris never worked at McDonald’s, disputing her statement about her past work experience. He points out that McDonald’s, as a franchised organization, does not maintain records for all its employees, making it difficult to confirm her claims. He suggests that Trump’s accusations are a disingenuous attempt to undermine Harris’s credibility and portray her as untrustworthy.

Return to top⤴️

Trump Biopic to be Released Before Election

🎦 40:20-41:02⏩

Jonathan mentions that a controversial biopic depicting Trump in an unflattering light has secured a US distribution deal and will be released in American cinemas in autumn. He believes that this film could have a significant impact on the election, particularly if it includes details about Trump's treatment of his first wife. He also notes that Trump’s first wife is buried in an unmarked plot at the back of one of his golf courses.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Denial of Project 2025

🎦 41:02-46:50⏩

Jonathan discusses Project 2025, a 900-page book outlining Trump's plans for his administration if re-elected. He notes that Trump initially denied any involvement in the project, claiming to know nothing about it. However, Jonathan provides evidence of Trump's involvement, highlighting Steve Bannon's statement that the project involves purging government institutions of “weaklings and pencil necks.” He also shares Tim Pool’s deleted video advocating for the imprisonment of Democrats if Trump wins the election, showcasing the project’s focus on purging government naysayers. Jonathan also highlights Kevin Roberts's involvement in Project 2025, revealing that he is the main figure behind the Heritage Foundation, which played a key role in developing the project. He highlights Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project despite his knowledge of it. He concludes by emphasizing Trump’s blatant lie about his lack of involvement, suggesting that his denial is a strategic move to avoid potential negative consequences.

Return to top⤴️

Music Copyright Issues for Trump Campaign

🎦 46:50-48:14⏩

Jonathan discusses the legal battles faced by the Trump campaign regarding music copyright issues. He highlights the demand by ABBA and their record label, Universal Music, that Trump cease using their songs at his campaign events. He also mentions that the family of Isaac Hayes has filed a lawsuit against Trump for using his music without a political use license. He concludes by pointing out that Trump's disregard for legal processes and his history of owing money to various entities are causing him further legal and financial problems.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Continued Conflicts

🎦 48:58-49:34⏩

Jonathan highlights Trump’s continued conflicts with various entities, including the US Army, Bud Light, the NFL, Taylor Swift, and Apple Pies. He points out the absurdity of Trump's actions and his tendency to pick fights with these organizations, suggesting that he is creating unnecessary problems for himself. He also mentions Chris LaSaVita's attempt to further fuel the conflict with the Army, highlighting his lack of judgment and strategic thinking.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Contradictory Statements and Nonsense

🎦 49:34-58:01⏩

Jonathan highlights a series of contradictory and nonsensical statements made by Trump, particularly regarding his views on abortion and the economy. He points out Trump’s inconsistent stance on abortion, suggesting that he has no ideological position and will say whatever he believes will benefit his political standing. He then shares a clip of Trump contradicting his previous statements on abortion, claiming that he wants more time for women to access abortion services, highlighting the inconsistency of his views and his lack of a clear ideological stance. He also discusses Trump’s claims about the economy, pointing out that he makes vague promises without providing clear explanations or plans for achieving them. He criticizes Trump's tendency to make meaningless statements about the economy, suggesting that he is incapable of providing concrete solutions or insights. Jonathan also discusses Trump's claim about his speaking abilities, pointing out his frequent mispronunciations and rambling nature, despite claiming to be a brilliant speaker who can deliver two-hour speeches without a single mispronunciation. He criticizes Trump's lack of self-awareness and his tendency to exaggerate his abilities. He concludes by suggesting that Trump's nonsensical statements and contradictions are deeply concerning and should disqualify him from running for president.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Approach to Decision Making

🎦 01:09:27-01:11⏩
:30⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s approach to decision making, focusing on his statement about learning from a five-minute conversation with truckers, claiming that this interaction gave him sufficient knowledge to make earth-shattering decisions about transportation. He criticizes Trump's lack of depth and understanding of complex issues, suggesting that his reliance on short conversations with individuals does not provide him with the necessary expertise to make informed decisions. Jonathan highlights the absurdity of Trump’s claim, suggesting that every politician in the US has far more meaningful interactions with individuals and groups, giving them greater knowledge and understanding of issues. He concludes by pointing out that Trump's claim is a blatant exaggeration of his abilities and understanding of the world, further demonstrating his lack of competence.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Attack on Kamala Harris

🎦 01:11:30-01:13⏩
:10⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s attack on Kamala Harris, criticizing his claim that she is a “nasty person” based on her interactions with Mike Pence and Justice Kavanaugh. He points out that Trump’s claim is hypocritical, considering his own history of vicious attacks against Pence and his incitement of a mob against him. He also highlights Trump's hypocrisy in criticizing Harris's strong questioning of Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court hearings, arguing that such questioning is essential for determining the suitability of a candidate for a high-ranking position. He concludes by highlighting Trump’s misogynistic and hypocritical attacks on Harris, further demonstrating his lack of character and integrity.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Statements on Transgender Issues

🎦 01:13:10-01:14⏩
:25⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s statements about transgender issues, highlighting his lack of understanding and empathy for the community. He notes that Trump’s response to a question about transgender issues demonstrates his disregard for the complexities of the subject and his intention to use the issue for political gain. He also criticizes Trump’s use of power as a means of attacking and eliminating transgender rights, revealing his authoritarian tendencies and his lack of respect for human rights.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Statements on Immigration

🎦 01:14:25-01:16⏩
:33⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s statements about immigration, criticizing his claim that immigrants are coming from countries that nobody has ever heard of. He points out that Trump is lying, highlighting the fact that he is well aware of the countries of origin for immigrants entering the US through the southern border. He criticizes Trump’s lack of knowledge and understanding of geography and his attempts to spread misinformation about immigrants. He also notes that Trump’s statements about immigrants “occupying seats in our schools” are a clear indication of his anti-immigrant sentiment and his desire to restrict immigration.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Speech Abandonment by Fox News

🎦 01:16:14-01:16⏩
:51⏩
Jonathan highlights the fact that Fox News has abandoned covering Trump's speeches due to their rambling nature and lack of substance. He suggests that Fox News is aware of Trump’s poor performance as a speaker and his inability to connect with viewers. He also points out that Fox News is likely concerned about maintaining their reputation and avoiding negative consequences for associating with Trump's erratic behaviour.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Attack on Harris's Economic Policies

🎦 01:16:33-01:17⏩
:13⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump's attack on Harris's economic policies, criticizing his lack of depth and substance in his criticism. He also points out that Trump's actions, rather than his words, are a clear indicator of his incompetence, highlighting his lack of focus on campaigning and his reliance on social media for his political activities. He concludes by suggesting that Trump's approach to governing and campaigning is a clear sign of his lack of ability to lead effectively.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Promotion of QAnon Conspiracy Theories

🎦 01:17:13-01:19⏩
:11⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s promotion of QAnon conspiracy theories, highlighting the fact that he is directly spreading the slogans of this cult. He criticizes Trump's willingness to endorse such harmful and baseless ideologies, emphasizing the danger of his actions and the potential for harm to individuals and society as a whole. He also criticizes Trump’s use of social media to spread these conspiracy theories, noting that his actions are intended to amplify the reach and impact of these harmful beliefs.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Sexist and Misogynistic Slurs

🎦 01:19:11-01:20⏩
:16⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump's promotion of sexist and misogynistic slurs on social media, highlighting the fact that he has reposted a vulgar reference to oral sex acts directed at Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton. He criticizes Trump’s lack of respect for women, his willingness to use sexist language, and his disregard for the impact of his actions. He also highlights the double standard in how Trump is treated compared to other politicians, suggesting that he receives a “free pass” for his misogynistic behaviour.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Continued Misogynistic Attacks

🎦 01:20:16-01:21⏩
:06⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s continued misogynistic attacks on women, highlighting his statements about Harris and Clinton, suggesting that their success is due to “blowjobs.” He also criticizes his attacks on other women, including Maxine Waters and Omarosa, highlighting his lack of respect for women and his tendency to demean them. He concludes by emphasizing the harmful nature of Trump’s words and actions, particularly those directed at women.

Return to top⤴️

Trump's Lack of Accountability

🎦 01:21:06-01:22⏩
:31⏩
Jonathan discusses Trump’s lack of accountability, highlighting the fact that he has faced minimal consequences for his actions, including his sexist and misogynistic behaviour. He criticizes the “moral majority” for failing to hold Trump accountable for his actions and the double standard that he receives compared to other politicians. He concludes by highlighting Trump’s history of misbehaviour, including his actions at a NATO meeting and Arlington National Cemetery, suggesting that he is incapable of learning from his mistakes and lacks the character and integrity to be president.

Return to top⤴️

J.D. Vance's Poor Performance at a Firefighter Union Conference

🎦 01:22:31-01:23⏩
:43⏩
Jonathan discusses J.D. Vance's poor performance at a firefighter union conference, highlighting the fact that he was booed offstage, while Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, received a warm reception from the same union. He believes that this demonstrates a clear difference in how the two candidates engage with voters, suggesting that Walz is better equipped to connect with and secure the support of various groups, while Vance lacks the necessary skills to build relationships and win over voters.

Return to top⤴️

Harris-Walz's Interview on CNN

🎦 01:23:43-01:32⏩
:11⏩
Jonathan discusses Harris-Walz's highly anticipated interview on CNN with Dana Bash, highlighting that the Republicans had been criticizing Harris for not conducting interviews. He notes that the interview was well-received by many Democrats, who praised Harris's performance, but acknowledges that the interview was simply a standard format and lacked any significant revelations. He highlights the fact that the interview was viewed as a success for Harris-Walz, given the high level of anticipation and concern surrounding it. Jonathan also discusses the criticisms surrounding the interview, highlighting the fact that some Democrats felt that Bash was simply reading right-wing talking points and not providing a fair and balanced platform. He concludes by stating that while the interview was generally well-received, there were also criticisms from both sides of the aisle, suggesting that it did not significantly impact voter sentiment.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's Response to Trump's Attacks

🎦 01:32:11-01:33⏩
:48⏩
Jonathan discusses Harris's response to Trump's attacks during the CNN interview, highlighting her calm and composed demeanour. He praises her response to Trump's question about her racial identity, suggesting that it was a strategic move to avoid engaging in a pointless argument and focus on the bigger picture. He concludes by suggesting that Harris handled the interview expertly, showcasing her composure and intelligence.

Return to top⤴️

Harris's Decision to Appoint a Republican to her Cabinet

🎦 01:33:48-01:34⏩
:35⏩
Jonathan discusses Harris's statement about appointing a Republican to her cabinet, highlighting her strategic move to reach across the aisle. He acknowledges that this decision is a sensible one for building bipartisan support and demonstrating a commitment to working with both parties. He also discusses the potential challenges and considerations involved in such a decision, highlighting the need to select someone with limited potential for causing harm to the administration's agenda.

Return to top⤴️

Wrap Up

🎦 01:34:35-01:36⏩
:02⏩
Jonathan concludes the video by summarizing the key takeaways from the US election update. He praises Harris for her competence and her ability to lead effectively, contrasting her with Trump, who he views as incapable of holding office due to his lack of smarts, intelligence, and integrity. He acknowledges the power of cognitive dissonance and the difficulty of convincing voters to abandon their pre-existing beliefs, especially in the context of a cult-like following for Trump. Jonathan encourages viewers to stay informed and continue to engage in critical thinking. He concludes by thanking viewers for watching and promising to speak to them soon.

Return to top⤴️